Aramideh M, Eekhof J L, Bour L J, Koelman J H, Speelman J D, Ongerboer de Visser B W
Graduate School Neurosciences, Amsterdam, AZUA, Department of Neurology, The Netherlands.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995 Jun;58(6):692-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.58.6.692.
Electromyographic (EMG) activity of orbicularis oculi and levator palpebrae muscles was recorded to study the origin of involuntary eyelid closure in 33 patients. The evoked blink reflex in all patients and in 23 controls was also studied. To examine the excitability of facial motoneurons and bulbar interneurons in individual patients and to compare the results with EMG findings, R1 and R2 recovery indices were calculated in all subjects, as the average of recovery values at 0.5, 0.3, and 0.21 second interstimulus intervals. Based on EMG patterns, the patients were divided into three subclasses: EMG subclass 1, 10 patients with involuntary discharges solely in orbicularis oculi muscle; EMG subclass 2, 20 patients with involuntary discharges in orbicularis oculi and either involuntary levator palpebrae inhibition or a disturbed reciprocal innervation between orbicularis oculi and levator palpebrae; EMG subclass 3, three patients who did not have blepharospasm, but had involuntary levator palpebrae inhibition in association with a basal ganglia disease. The total patient group showed an enhanced recovery of both R1 and R2 components compared with controls. Although 30 out of 33 patients had blepharospasm (EMG subclasses 1 and 2), R1 recovery index was normal in 64% and R2 recovery index was normal in 54%. Patients with an abnormal R2 recovery index had an abnormal R1 recovery index significantly more often. All patients from EMG subclass 1 had an abnormal R2 recovery index, whereas all patients from EMG subclass 3 had normal recovery indices for both R1 and R2 responses. Seventy five per cent of the patients from EMG subclass 2 had normal recovery indices. The results provide further evidence that physiologically blepharospasm is not a homogeneous disease entity, and indicate that different pathophysiological mechanisms at the suprasegmental, or segmental level, or both are involved.
记录了33例患者眼轮匝肌和提上睑肌的肌电图(EMG)活动,以研究不自主眼睑闭合的起源。还研究了所有患者以及23名对照者的诱发眨眼反射。为了检查个体患者面部运动神经元和延髓中间神经元的兴奋性,并将结果与EMG结果进行比较,计算了所有受试者的R1和R2恢复指数,作为刺激间隔为0.5、0.3和0.21秒时恢复值的平均值。根据EMG模式,将患者分为三个亚组:EMG亚组1,10例仅眼轮匝肌有不自主放电的患者;EMG亚组2,20例眼轮匝肌有不自主放电且提上睑肌有不自主抑制或眼轮匝肌与提上睑肌之间相互神经支配紊乱的患者;EMG亚组3,3例无眼睑痉挛但因基底节疾病伴有提上睑肌不自主抑制的患者。与对照组相比,患者总组的R1和R2成分恢复均增强。虽然33例患者中有30例有眼睑痉挛(EMG亚组1和2),但64%的患者R1恢复指数正常,54%的患者R2恢复指数正常。R2恢复指数异常的患者R1恢复指数异常的情况明显更常见。EMG亚组1的所有患者R2恢复指数均异常,而EMG亚组3的所有患者R1和R2反应的恢复指数均正常。EMG亚组2的患者中有75%恢复指数正常。结果进一步证明,生理性眼睑痉挛不是一种同质的疾病实体,并表明在节段上或节段水平或两者均涉及不同的病理生理机制。