Dickman C A, Sonntag V K
Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona.
J Neurosurg. 1995 Aug;83(2):248-53. doi: 10.3171/jns.1995.83.2.0248.
Sixteen patients referred for atlantoaxial fixation failures were treated surgically with revision procedures during the past decade. Of these 16 patients, atlantoaxial instability occurred because of rheumatoid arthritis in five, as odontoideum in seven, transverse ligament disruption in two, and odontoid fracture nonunion in two. The 16 individuals (10 men, six women; mean age 43.7 years; age range 20-77 years) had undergone a total of 20 C1-2 internal fixation procedures that failed. Surgical strategies for definitive revision of the nonunions in these 16 subjects included 10 rigid internal fixations with transarticular screws, three revised C1-2 fixations with autogenous bone struts and wire or cables, and three extended fixations with occipitocervical instrumentation. Autogenous grafts were used in all revisions. A postoperative halo brace was used in five individuals with osteoporotic bone; all patients wore a restrictive postoperative cervical orthosis. Postoperatively, 15 patients (94%) had a stable construct (mean follow up 35 months; range 12-79 months), which included 13 osseous unions and two stable fibrous unions. One patient had nonunion; he fractured his anterior C1-2 transarticular screws 2 years postoperatively. He had occipital radicular pain without myelopathy but refused further surgery. Atlantoaxial pseudarthroses were effectively treated by addressing the pathological, biomechanical, and technical reasons for failed fusion. Successful fusion after reoperation was improved by using autologous bone grafts, adequately controlling atlantoaxial motion (with rigid transarticular screws internally or externally with a halo vest), compressing the bone grafts between the arches of C-1 and C-2 with wire cables, meticulously preparing the fusion bed, and by optimizing the pharmacological and clinical parameters to promote bone healing.
在过去十年中,16例因寰枢椎固定失败而转诊的患者接受了手术翻修治疗。在这16例患者中,寰枢椎不稳的原因包括类风湿关节炎5例、齿突发育不全7例、横韧带断裂2例、齿突骨折不愈合2例。这16例患者(10例男性,6例女性;平均年龄43.7岁;年龄范围20 - 77岁)共进行了20次C1 - 2内固定手术,但均失败。这16例患者不愈合的最终翻修手术策略包括10例采用经关节螺钉的坚强内固定、3例采用自体骨支柱及钢丝或缆线的改良C1 - 2固定、3例采用枕颈器械的扩大固定。所有翻修手术均使用了自体骨移植。5例骨质疏松患者术后使用了头环支具;所有患者术后均佩戴限制性颈部矫形器。术后,15例患者(94%)获得了稳定的结构(平均随访35个月;范围12 - 79个月),其中包括13例骨性愈合和2例稳定的纤维性愈合。1例患者出现不愈合;他在术后2年发生了C1 - 2前经关节螺钉骨折。他有枕部神经根性疼痛但无脊髓病,拒绝进一步手术。通过解决融合失败的病理、生物力学和技术原因,有效地治疗了寰枢椎假关节。再次手术后通过使用自体骨移植、充分控制寰枢椎活动(内部使用坚强的经关节螺钉或外部使用头环背心)、用缆线在C - 1和C - 2椎弓之间压缩骨移植、精心准备融合床以及优化促进骨愈合的药理和临床参数,提高了成功融合的几率。