Post M W, van Asbeck F W, van Dijk A J, Schrijvers A J
Vakgroep Algemene Gezondheidszorg en Epidemiologie, faculteit Geneeskunde, Universiteit Utrecht.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1995 Jul 8;139(27):1376-80.
Clinimetric evaluation of a Dutch questionnaire version of the Barthel Index (BI).
Survey.
Eight Dutch rehabilitation centres.
Interviews with 318 spinal cord injured (SCI) patients living in the community, who were between 18 and 65 years of age at the time of the interview and who were admitted for the first time after injury to a specialized rehabilitation unit between 1986 and 1992. Validity, reliability and discriminant validity of the BI were determined.
This Dutch questionnaire version of the BI had good reliability (Cronbach's alpha: 0.87; all item-total correlations > or = 0.30). In case of persons with a complete SCI a strong and statistically significant relationship was found between BI score and the level of the lesion (Spearman-Brown correlation: 0.69; p < 0.0001). Patients with more serious lesions had significantly higher BI scores than patients with less serious lesions.
This Dutch questionnaire version of the BI was a sufficiently reliable and valid measure for assessing ability to cope in activities of daily living. Further research should be done on the test-retest reliability and responsiveness of this BI version.
对荷兰语版巴氏指数(BI)问卷进行临床测量学评估。
调查。
八家荷兰康复中心。
对318名居住在社区的脊髓损伤(SCI)患者进行访谈,这些患者在访谈时年龄在18至65岁之间,于1986年至1992年间首次因伤入住专门的康复单元。确定了BI的效度、信度和区分效度。
该荷兰语问卷版BI具有良好的信度(克朗巴赫α系数:0.87;所有项目与总分的相关性≥0.30)。对于完全性SCI患者,发现BI评分与损伤平面之间存在强且具有统计学意义的关系(斯皮尔曼 - 布朗相关性:0.69;p < 0.0001)。损伤更严重的患者BI评分显著高于损伤较轻的患者。
该荷兰语问卷版BI是评估日常生活活动应对能力的一种足够可靠且有效的测量工具。应进一步研究该BI版本的重测信度和反应度。