Chmielewski P M, Fernandes L O, Yee C M, Miller G A
Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 61820, USA.
J Abnorm Psychol. 1995 Aug;104(3):464-70. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.104.3.464.
Data for Caucasian, African American, Asian American, and Latino college-student samples were compared for several popular self-report scales of psychopathology. Significant group differences were obtained for all scales, with the Caucasian sample consistently having the lowest means. Some gender effects and interactions with ethnic group were also observed. The authors discuss implications of these findings for use of these scales, including implications for use of Caucasian norms with other ethnic samples.
对高加索裔、非裔美国、亚裔美国和拉丁裔大学生样本在几种常用的精神病理学自陈量表上的数据进行了比较。所有量表均获得了显著的组间差异，高加索裔样本的平均分始终最低。还观察到了一些性别效应以及与种族群体的交互作用。作者讨论了这些发现对这些量表使用的影响，包括使用高加索裔常模用于其他种族样本的影响。
