van Deuren M, van Dijke B J, Koopman R J, Horrevorts A M, Meis J F, Santman F W, van der Meer J W
Department of Internal Medicine, Nijmegen University Hospital, The Netherlands.
BMJ. 1993 May 8;306(6887):1229-32. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6887.1229.
To evaluate the usefulness of Gram staining and culture of skin lesions in patients with acute meningococcal infections.
Retrospective study.
Community hospital and intensive care unit of a teaching hospital.
51 patients admitted from 1989 to 1993 with proved meningococcal infections and microbiological examination of specimens from skin lesions.
Needle aspiration of a skin lesion before start of antibiotic treatment in 26 patients in the community hospital; punch biopsy of skin lesion after start of antibiotic treatment in 25 patients in the teaching hospital.
Detection of meningococci by Gram staining of specimens from skin lesions according to category of infection (meningococcaemia, meningitis, meningitis with shock, or septic shock without meningitis).
Bacteria were detected in the specimen from haemorrhagic skin lesions by culture or Gram staining, or both in 32 (63%) patients. The sensitivity of the Gram stain was 51% and did not differ significantly from its sensitivity in detecting bacteria in cerebrospinal fluid. In meningococcal sepsis, however, a Gram stained skin lesion was significantly more sensitive (72%) than Gram stained cerebrospinal fluid (22%). In patients with meningitis skin lesions gave positive results on staining more often if shock was present. The results for punch biopsy specimens were not affected by antibiotics as Gram staining gave positive results up to 45 hours after the start of treatment and culture gave positive results up to 13 hours.
Microbiological examination of skin lesions is informative, especially in patients with sepsis and inconclusive results from cerebrospinal fluid, and may provide a diagnosis in such patients within 45 minutes. It differentiates well between meningitis with and without haemodynamic complications, and the result is not affected by previous antibiotic treatment.
评估革兰氏染色及皮肤病变培养在急性脑膜炎球菌感染患者中的应用价值。
回顾性研究。
社区医院及一所教学医院的重症监护病房。
1989年至1993年间收治的51例确诊为脑膜炎球菌感染且对皮肤病变标本进行了微生物学检查的患者。
社区医院的26例患者在开始抗生素治疗前对皮肤病变进行针吸活检;教学医院的25例患者在开始抗生素治疗后对皮肤病变进行打孔活检。
根据感染类型(脑膜炎球菌血症、脑膜炎、伴有休克的脑膜炎或无脑膜炎的感染性休克),通过对皮肤病变标本进行革兰氏染色检测脑膜炎球菌。
通过培养或革兰氏染色,或两者皆用,在32例(63%)患者的出血性皮肤病变标本中检测到细菌。革兰氏染色的敏感性为51%,与在脑脊液中检测细菌的敏感性无显著差异。然而,在脑膜炎球菌败血症中,革兰氏染色的皮肤病变比革兰氏染色的脑脊液敏感性显著更高(72%比22%)。在患有脑膜炎的患者中,如果存在休克,皮肤病变染色阳性结果更常见。打孔活检标本的结果不受抗生素影响,因为革兰氏染色在治疗开始后45小时内仍可得到阳性结果,培养在治疗开始后13小时内仍可得到阳性结果。
皮肤病变的微生物学检查具有重要意义,尤其是在败血症患者以及脑脊液检查结果不明确的患者中,并且可以在45分钟内为这类患者提供诊断。它能很好地区分伴有和不伴有血流动力学并发症的脑膜炎,且结果不受先前抗生素治疗的影响。