Funke G, Falsen E, Barreau C
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Zürich, Switzerland.
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jan;33(1):188-92. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.1.188-192.1995.
Over nearly two decades, 13 yellow- or orange-pigmented, fermentative gram-positive rods belonging to the genus Microbacterium were encountered in clinical specimens. All 13 strains, 10 of which came from blood cultures, were initially identified as CDC coryneform group A-4 and A-5 bacteria according to the scheme of Hollis and Weaver for the identification of gram-positive rods. The clinical isolates were compared with the type strains of the six species constituting the genus Microbacterium as well as with three Microbacterium strains isolated from hospital environments. By biochemical methods only 5 of 13 clinical isolates could be identified to species level. Peptidoglycan analysis proved to be a valuable tool for differentiation between Microbacterium spp. and related genera, whereas cellular fatty acid analysis did not allow species identification within the genus Microbacterium. The 22 Microbacterium strains studied were, in general, susceptible to antimicrobial agents used in the treatment of infections caused by gram-positive rods. This report is the first one concerning the isolation of Microbacterium strains from clinical specimens. The sources as well as the mode of transmission remain to be established.
在近二十年的时间里,在临床标本中发现了13株属于微杆菌属的黄色或橙色色素沉着、发酵型革兰氏阳性杆菌。所有13株菌株,其中10株来自血培养,根据霍利斯和韦弗用于鉴定革兰氏阳性杆菌的方案,最初被鉴定为CDC棒状杆菌A-4和A-5群细菌。将临床分离株与构成微杆菌属的六个种的模式菌株以及从医院环境中分离的三株微杆菌菌株进行了比较。通过生化方法,13株临床分离株中只有5株能够鉴定到种水平。肽聚糖分析被证明是区分微杆菌属物种与相关属的有价值工具,而细胞脂肪酸分析无法在微杆菌属内进行物种鉴定。所研究的22株微杆菌菌株通常对用于治疗革兰氏阳性杆菌引起的感染的抗菌药物敏感。本报告是关于从临床标本中分离微杆菌菌株的第一份报告。其来源以及传播方式仍有待确定。