Laffer C L, Elijovich F
Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Clin Auton Res. 1994 Dec;4(6):323-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01821533.
Predictive models for the pressor response to the outpatient clinic visit (PRC) in essential hypertensives with and without diabetes are proposed. The hypotheses are derived from previous studies about the univariate correlates of this response. PRC was measured with ambulatory monitors. Twenty-four hour blood pressures and average PRCs were similar in the two groups. Diabetics had faster 24-h heart rates, decreased heart rate variability, a broader range of PRCs and more depressor responders. PRC of nondiabetics correlated with duration of hypertension and was dependent on race; the predictive model had R2 of 0.19. In contrast, PRC of diabetics exhibited correlations with age, weight, BP and blood glucose and the model had R2 of 0.71. The data suggest that: diabetics had autonomic dysfunction, that their PRC can be modelled with predictors that are accepted correlates of autonomic neuropathy, and that these predictors attenuated PRC or its buffering. If these results were confirmed by prospective application of the model to a larger group of patients, 'true' blood pressures could be estimated by subtraction of predicted PRC from office blood pressures in diabetic, but not in nondiabetic, hypertensive patients.
提出了针对伴有和不伴有糖尿病的原发性高血压患者门诊就诊时升压反应(PRC)的预测模型。这些假设源自先前关于该反应单变量相关性的研究。PRC通过动态监测仪进行测量。两组患者的24小时血压和平均PRC相似。糖尿病患者的24小时心率更快,心率变异性降低,PRC范围更广,降压反应者更多。非糖尿病患者的PRC与高血压病程相关且取决于种族;预测模型的R2为0.19。相比之下,糖尿病患者的PRC与年龄、体重、血压和血糖相关,模型的R2为0.71。数据表明:糖尿病患者存在自主神经功能障碍,他们的PRC可用被认可为自主神经病变相关因素的预测指标进行建模,并且这些预测指标会减弱PRC或其缓冲作用。如果通过将该模型前瞻性应用于更大规模患者群体来证实这些结果,那么在糖尿病高血压患者中,可通过从诊室血压中减去预测的PRC来估计“真实”血压,但在非糖尿病高血压患者中则不行。