Altamura G, Bianconi L, Lo Bianco F, Toscano S, Ammirati F, Pandozi C, Castro A, Cardinale M, Mennuni M, Santini M
Department of Heart Disease, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1995 Jan;18(1 Pt 2):194-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb02503.x.
External defibrillation is widely used for the termination of various atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias, including pacemaker patients. Our study was intended to evaluate the effects of DC shocks in 36 patients with unipolar pacemakers implanted in the right pectoral region (25 DDD, 10 VVI, 3 AAI). The shocks were delivered with paddles on the anterior surface of the thorax, as far as possible away from the pacemaker. The pacing output was programmed at 0.5 msec and 5 V (25 patients), 4 V (1 patient), and 2.5 V (10 patients). Transient loss of capture occurred in 18 patients (50%). These patients, compared with those without capture failure, received higher peak and cumulative shock energies, respectively, 216 +/- 99 versus 123 +/- 50 joules (P < 0.002) and 352 +/- 62 versus 147 +/- 98 joules (P < 0.004) and had a lower pacemaker pulse amplitude (4.0 +/- 1.2 vs 4.6 +/- 1.0 V, P = 0.11). Failure to capture lasted from 5 seconds to 30 minutes (mean 157 sec). In 15 patients the ventricular stimulation threshold was measured before and serially after cardioversion. A six-fold threshold increase was observed 3 minutes after the shock (P < 0.004) with gradual recovery to nearly baseline values at 24 hours. Transient sensing failure occurred in 7 of the 17 patients in whom it could be evaluated (41%). Furthermore, three cases of shock induced pacemaker malfunctions were observed requiring replacement of the stimulator in two patients. In conclusion, the incidence of loss of capture in pacemaker patients subjected to electrical cardioversion/defibrillation is high.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
体外除颤广泛应用于终止各种房性和室性快速心律失常,包括起搏器植入患者。我们的研究旨在评估直流电电击对36例右胸植入单极起搏器患者(25例DDD型、10例VVI型、3例AAI型)的影响。电击通过置于胸前壁的电极板进行,尽可能远离起搏器。起搏输出设置为0.5毫秒和5伏(25例患者)、4伏(1例患者)和2.5伏(10例患者)。18例患者(50%)出现短暂夺获丧失。与未发生夺获失败的患者相比,这些患者分别接受了更高的峰值和累积电击能量,分别为216±99焦耳对123±50焦耳(P<0.002)和352±62焦耳对147±98焦耳(P<0.004),且起搏器脉冲幅度较低(4.0±1.2伏对4.6±1.0伏,P = 0.11)。夺获失败持续时间为5秒至30分钟(平均157秒)。15例患者在心脏复律前后连续测量心室刺激阈值。电击后3分钟观察到阈值增加了6倍(P<0.004),并在24小时逐渐恢复至接近基线值。17例可评估的患者中有7例(41%)出现短暂感知失败。此外,观察到3例电击诱发的起搏器故障,其中2例患者需要更换刺激器。总之,接受电复律/除颤的起搏器患者中夺获丧失的发生率很高。(摘要截短于250字)