Champault G, Benoît J, Lauroy J, Rizk N, Boutelier P
Service de Chirurgie, Hôpital Jean-Verdier, Bondy.
Ann Chir. 1994;48(11):1003-8.
181 patients have been included in a controlled randomized prospective study to compare two hernia repair technics: Classic al Shouldice herniography vs totally pre-peritoneal video-surgery. There was no mortality and no difference concerning morbidity, operating time and hospital stay. Videosurgery allows detection and treatment of some bilateral hernias not diagnosed by clinical exam, ensures better post-operative comfort and has a significant effect on the time to return to work (12.5 vs 24.3 days). There was no recurrence in either group with a 12-month follow-up. These patients must be followed for a long time to compare their late results with those of conventional technics.
181名患者被纳入一项对照随机前瞻性研究,以比较两种疝气修复技术:经典的Shouldice疝修补术与完全腹膜前视频手术。两组在死亡率、发病率、手术时间和住院时间方面均无差异。视频手术能够检测和治疗一些临床检查未诊断出的双侧疝气,术后舒适度更高,对恢复工作时间有显著影响(分别为12.5天和24.3天)。在12个月的随访中,两组均无复发。这些患者必须长期随访,以便将其远期结果与传统技术的结果进行比较。