• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Uses and abuses of statistical models for evaluating trauma care.

作者信息

Jones J M, Redmond A D, Templeton J

机构信息

Keele University, Staffordshire, England.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1995 Jan;38(1):89-93. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199501000-00023.

DOI:10.1097/00005373-199501000-00023
PMID:7745668
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A statistical model is a powerful tool for evaluating trauma care. With accident and emergency clinicians becoming more aware of the importance of monitoring their department's performance, there is a danger that such models may be inappropriately applied to new sets of trauma cases, resulting in misleading evaluations. The primary objective is to present a method for assessing whether an existing survival probability model can be correctly applied to a different data set.

METHODS

Correct and incorrect utilization of statistical models for evaluating the mortality of trauma patients are presented. Circumstances that may lead to the modification of an existing model, and the use of statistical models for evaluating different aspects of trauma care, are suggested.

摘要

相似文献

1
Uses and abuses of statistical models for evaluating trauma care.
J Trauma. 1995 Jan;38(1):89-93. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199501000-00023.
2
Validation of TRISS and ASCOT using a non-MTOS trauma registry.使用非MTOS创伤登记系统对TRISS和ASCOT进行验证。
J Trauma. 1995 Jan;38(1):83-8. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199501000-00022.
3
Predictors of mortality in adult patients with blunt injuries in New York State: a comparison of the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) and the International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision-based Injury Severity Score (ICISS).纽约州钝性损伤成年患者的死亡率预测因素:创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)与基于国际疾病分类第九版的损伤严重程度评分(ICISS)的比较。
J Trauma. 1999 Jul;47(1):8-14. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199907000-00003.
4
A new approach to outcome prediction in trauma: A comparison with the TRISS model.创伤结局预测的一种新方法:与TRISS模型的比较。
J Trauma. 2006 Sep;61(3):701-10. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000197175.91116.10.
5
Retrospective evaluation of the BIG score to predict mortality in pediatric blunt trauma.回顾性评估 BIG 评分对儿科钝性创伤患者死亡率的预测价值。
CJEM. 2018 Jul;20(4):592-599. doi: 10.1017/cem.2017.379. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
6
The Applicability of Trauma and Injury Severity Score for a Blunt Trauma Population in Korea and a Proposal of New Models Using Score Predictors.创伤和损伤严重程度评分在韩国钝性创伤人群中的适用性及使用评分预测指标的新模型建议
Yonsei Med J. 2016 May;57(3):728-34. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.3.728.
7
The use of statistical process control for monitoring institutional performance in trauma care.使用统计过程控制来监测创伤护理中的机构绩效。
J Trauma. 2008 Dec;65(6):1494-501. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31815ebabf.
8
A simple mathematical modification of TRISS markedly improves calibration.对TRISS进行简单的数学修正可显著改善校准。
J Trauma. 2002 Oct;53(4):630-4. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200210000-00002.
9
Validity of applying adult TRISS analysis to injured children.
J Trauma. 1991 May;31(5):691-7; discussion 697-8. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199105000-00014.
10
An evaluation of Ontario trauma outcomes and the development of regional norms for Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) analysis.安大略省创伤结果评估及创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)分析的区域标准制定。
J Trauma. 1996 Oct;41(4):731-4. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199610000-00023.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of risk-adjusted survival in two Scandinavian Level-I trauma centres.两个斯堪的纳维亚一级创伤中心风险调整后生存率的比较。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 May 10;24:66. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0257-9.
2
Norwegian survival prediction model in trauma: modelling effects of anatomic injury, acute physiology, age, and co-morbidity.挪威创伤生存预测模型:解剖损伤、急性生理学、年龄及合并症的建模效应
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Mar;58(3):303-15. doi: 10.1111/aas.12256. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
3
Influence of routine computed tomography on predicted survival from blunt thoracoabdominal trauma.
常规计算机断层扫描对钝性胸腹联合伤预测生存的影响。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2011 Apr;37(2):185-90. doi: 10.1007/s00068-010-0042-9. Epub 2010 Jul 29.
4
The Utstein template for uniform reporting of data following major trauma: a joint revision by SCANTEM, TARN, DGU-TR and RITG.重大创伤后数据统一报告的Utstein模板:由SCANTEM、TARN、DGU-TR和RITG联合修订。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2008 Aug 28;16:7. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-16-7.
5
Prehospital triage and survival of major trauma patients in a Dutch regional trauma system: relevance of trauma registry.荷兰地区创伤系统中重大创伤患者的院前分诊与生存情况:创伤登记的相关性
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2006 Aug;391(4):343-9. doi: 10.1007/s00423-006-0057-1. Epub 2006 May 13.
6
Evaluation of trauma care: validation of the TRISS method in an Italian ICU.
Intensive Care Med. 1996 Sep;22(9):941-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02044120.