Vasankari T, Kujala U, Heinonen O, Kapanen J, Ahotupa M
Department of Physiology, University of Turku, Finland.
Clin Chim Acta. 1995 Jan 31;234(1-2):63-9. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(94)05976-y.
Serum lipid peroxidation was measured by three different methods (diene conjugation, DC; thiobarbituric acid reactive material, TBARM; and fluorescent chromolipids, FC) during physical exercise of different duration. The aim of the study was to investigate which of the three methods is the most representative in measuring oxidative stress after physiological stimulus (physical exercise) in man. In general, diene conjugation is a measure of early events of lipid peroxidation reactions, TBARM measures end products of lipid peroxidation and FC are products formed by reaction of end products of lipid peroxidation with the amino groups. In trial I, 8 subjects ran 1 km with maximal speed; in trial II, 7 subjects ran 10 km with maximal speed; in trial III, 9 subjects ran 27 km with maximal speed, and in trial IV, 5 subjects cycled 8 days in competition, altogether 1061 km biking. In each trial venous blood samples were taken before and immediately after the exercise. In trials II, III, and IV serum DC concentration increased by 14% (P < 0.05), 11% (P < 0.01), and 25% (P < 0.05), respectively, during the exercise. FC or TBARM did not change in the trials. We conclude that DC as a measure of the early phase of lipid peroxidation may be less affected by protective antioxidant functions than FC and TBARM methods, which both measure end products of lipid peroxidation. Therefore, DC may be the most sensitive of the three methods to estimate serum lipid peroxidation induced by exercise in man.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在不同时长的体育锻炼过程中,采用三种不同方法(双烯共轭法,DC;硫代巴比妥酸反应物质法,TBARM;荧光色素脂法,FC)测定血清脂质过氧化水平。本研究旨在探究这三种方法中哪一种在测量人体生理刺激(体育锻炼)后的氧化应激方面最具代表性。一般来说,双烯共轭法用于测量脂质过氧化反应的早期事件,TBARM法测量脂质过氧化的终产物,而FC法测量的是脂质过氧化终产物与氨基反应形成的产物。在试验I中,8名受试者以最大速度跑1公里;在试验II中,7名受试者以最大速度跑10公里;在试验III中,9名受试者以最大速度跑27公里;在试验IV中,5名受试者参加为期8天的自行车比赛,骑行总里程达1061公里。在每次试验中,于运动前和运动后即刻采集静脉血样。在试验II、III和IV中,运动期间血清DC浓度分别升高了14%(P < 0.05)、11%(P < 0.01)和25%(P < 0.05)。在这些试验中,FC或TBARM未发生变化。我们得出结论,作为脂质过氧化早期阶段测量指标的DC,可能比FC和TBARM方法受保护性抗氧化功能的影响更小,后两者均测量脂质过氧化的终产物。因此,DC可能是这三种方法中评估人体运动诱导的血清脂质过氧化最敏感的方法。(摘要截短至250字)