Begg C B, Mazumdar M
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021.
Biometrics. 1994 Dec;50(4):1088-101.
An adjusted rank correlation test is proposed as a technique for identifying publication bias in a meta-analysis, and its operating characteristics are evaluated via simulations. The test statistic is a direct statistical analogue of the popular "funnel-graph." The number of component studies in the meta-analysis, the nature of the selection mechanism, the range of variances of the effect size estimates, and the true underlying effect size are all observed to be influential in determining the power of the test. The test is fairly powerful for large meta-analyses with 75 component studies, but has only moderate power for meta-analyses with 25 component studies. However, in many of the configurations in which there is low power, there is also relatively little bias in the summary effect size estimate. Nonetheless, the test must be interpreted with caution in small meta-analyses. In particular, bias cannot be ruled out if the test is not significant. The proposed technique has potential utility as an exploratory tool for meta-analysts, as a formal procedure to complement the funnel-graph.
提出了一种调整后的秩相关检验作为在荟萃分析中识别发表偏倚的技术,并通过模拟评估其操作特征。检验统计量是流行的“漏斗图”的直接统计类似物。观察到荟萃分析中的成分研究数量、选择机制的性质、效应大小估计的方差范围以及真正的潜在效应大小在确定检验功效方面都具有影响力。对于有75项成分研究的大型荟萃分析,该检验相当有效,但对于有25项成分研究的荟萃分析,其功效仅为中等。然而,在许多功效较低的配置中,汇总效应大小估计中的偏差也相对较小。尽管如此,在小型荟萃分析中对该检验的解释必须谨慎。特别是,如果检验不显著,不能排除存在偏差。所提出的技术作为荟萃分析人员的探索工具,作为补充漏斗图的正式程序具有潜在用途。