Kenward M G, Lesaffre E, Molenberghs G
Statistics Department, IACR Rothamsted, Harpenden, Herts, United Kingdom.
Biometrics. 1994 Dec;50(4):945-53.
Data are analysed from a longitudinal psychiatric study in which there are no dropouts that do not occur completely at random. A marginal proportional odds model is fitted that relates the response (severity of side effects) to various covariates. Two methods of estimation are used: generalized estimating equations (GEE) and maximum likelihood (ML). Both the complete set of data and the data from only those subjects completing the study are analysed. For the completers-only data, the GEE and ML analyses produce very similar results. These results differ considerably from those obtained from the analyses of the full data set. There are also marked differences between the results obtained from the GEE and ML analysis of the full data set. The occurrence of such differences is consistent with the presence of a non-completely-random dropout process and it can be concluded in this example that both the analyses of the completers only and the GEE analysis of the full data set produce misleading conclusions about the relationships between the response and covariates.
对一项纵向精神病学研究的数据进行了分析,该研究中不存在非完全随机发生的失访情况。拟合了一个边际比例优势模型,该模型将反应(副作用严重程度)与各种协变量联系起来。使用了两种估计方法:广义估计方程(GEE)和最大似然估计(ML)。对完整数据集以及仅来自完成研究的那些受试者的数据进行了分析。对于仅完成者的数据,GEE和ML分析产生非常相似的结果。这些结果与从完整数据集分析中获得的结果有很大差异。完整数据集的GEE和ML分析结果之间也存在显著差异。这种差异的出现与存在非完全随机的失访过程是一致的,并且在这个例子中可以得出结论,仅对完成者的分析和完整数据集的GEE分析都会对反应与协变量之间的关系产生误导性结论。