• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

私人医疗保险与健康人格:产科干预的新风险因素?

Private health insurance and a healthy personality: new risk factors for obstetric intervention?

作者信息

Fisher J, Smith A, Astbury J

机构信息

Key Centre for Women's Health in Society, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Mar;16(1):1-9. doi: 10.3109/01674829509025651.

DOI:10.3109/01674829509025651
PMID:7787952
Abstract

In this study 242 nulliparous pregnant women completed standardized psychometric questionnaires and semi-structured interviews in the latter half of pregnancy and again 4-6 weeks postpartum. Discriminant function analysis revealed that the use of operative obstetric interventions was measurably influenced by psychosocial factors. Privately insured women were significantly more likely to experience instrumentally assisted (relative risk = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.05, 2.25) and Caesarean (relative risk = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.05, 3.46) deliveries than those receiving care in the public hospital system. The likelihood of experiencing these procedures was increased further among those who in late pregnancy were thinking clearly, had high self-esteem, mature means of dealing with anxiety, were confident in their knowledge of childbirth procedures and in secure partnerships with highly educated men. There was no evidence that either elevated anxiety or abnormalities of personality contributed to obstetric outcome. These findings indicate that obstetric decision-making is significantly influenced by patient personality and socioeconomic circumstances. In particular, they suggest that fear of malpractice litigation, physician convenience factors and the response of obstetricians to assured, well pregnancy-educated pregnant women may be influencing the use of operative intervention in delivery.

摘要

在本研究中,242名未生育的孕妇在妊娠后半期完成了标准化心理测量问卷和半结构化访谈,并在产后4 - 6周再次进行。判别函数分析显示,社会心理因素对产科手术干预的使用有显著影响。与在公立医院系统接受治疗的女性相比,拥有私人保险的女性更有可能接受器械辅助分娩(相对风险 = 1.53,95%置信区间:1.05,2.25)和剖宫产(相对风险 = 1.91,95%置信区间:1.05,3.46)。在妊娠晚期思维清晰、自尊心强、有成熟的焦虑应对方式、对分娩程序知识有信心且与受过高等教育的男性建立稳固伴侣关系的女性中,经历这些分娩方式的可能性进一步增加。没有证据表明焦虑加剧或人格异常会影响产科结局。这些发现表明,产科决策受患者个性和社会经济状况的显著影响。特别是,它们表明对医疗事故诉讼的担忧、医生的便利因素以及产科医生对自信且接受过良好孕期教育的孕妇的反应,可能正在影响分娩中手术干预的使用。

相似文献

1
Private health insurance and a healthy personality: new risk factors for obstetric intervention?私人医疗保险与健康人格:产科干预的新风险因素?
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Mar;16(1):1-9. doi: 10.3109/01674829509025651.
2
Women's preferences and mode of delivery in public and private hospitals: a prospective cohort study.公立医院和私立医院中女性的偏好与分娩方式:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Feb 8;16:34. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0824-0.
3
Adverse psychological impact of operative obstetric interventions: a prospective longitudinal study.产科手术干预的不良心理影响:一项前瞻性纵向研究。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1997 Oct;31(5):728-38. doi: 10.3109/00048679709062687.
4
Effects of psychosocial support during labour and childbirth on breastfeeding, medical interventions, and mothers' wellbeing in a Mexican public hospital: a randomised clinical trial.分娩期间心理社会支持对墨西哥一家公立医院母乳喂养、医疗干预及母亲幸福感的影响:一项随机临床试验
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Oct;105(10):1056-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09936.x.
5
'If I do 10-15 normal deliveries in a month I hardly ever sleep at home.' A qualitative study of health providers' reasons for high rates of caesarean deliveries in private sector maternity care in Delhi, India.'如果我一个月做 10-15 次正常分娩,我几乎从不回家睡觉。' 一项针对印度德里私营部门产科护理中剖腹产率高的卫生提供者原因的定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Dec 3;18(1):470. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2095-4.
6
Personality, fear of childbirth and birth outcomes in nulliparous women.初产妇的个性、分娩恐惧与分娩结局
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 May;291(5):1055-62. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3532-x. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
7
Does medical insurance type (private vs public) influence the physician's decision to perform Caesarean delivery?医疗保险类型(私立与公立)是否会影响医生行剖宫产术的决策?
J Med Ethics. 2012 Aug;38(8):470-3. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100209. Epub 2012 May 5.
8
Effects of prolonged second stage, method of birth, timing of caesarean section and other obstetric risk factors on postnatal urinary incontinence: an Australian nulliparous cohort study.第二产程延长、分娩方式、剖宫产时机及其他产科危险因素对产后尿失禁的影响:一项澳大利亚初产妇队列研究。
BJOG. 2011 Jul;118(8):991-1000. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02928.x. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
9
Effects of a midwife psycho-education intervention to reduce childbirth fear on women's birth outcomes and postpartum psychological wellbeing.助产士心理教育干预对减轻分娩恐惧、产妇分娩结局及产后心理健康的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Oct 30;15:284. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0721-y.
10
Prevalence and determinants of caesarean section in private and public health facilities in underserved South Asian communities: cross-sectional analysis of data from Bangladesh, India and Nepal.南亚贫困社区私立和公立医疗机构剖宫产的患病率及影响因素:对孟加拉国、印度和尼泊尔数据的横断面分析
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 30;4(12):e005982. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005982.

引用本文的文献

1
Attitude of pregnant women towards Normal delivery and factors driving use of caesarian section in Iran (2016).伊朗孕妇对顺产的态度及剖宫产使用的驱动因素(2016年)
Biopsychosoc Med. 2019 Apr 1;13:8. doi: 10.1186/s13030-019-0149-0. eCollection 2019.
2
Factors affecting the choice of type of delivery with breast feeding in Iranian mothers.影响伊朗母亲母乳喂养时分娩方式选择的因素。
Electron Physician. 2017 Sep 25;9(9):5265-5269. doi: 10.19082/5265. eCollection 2017 Sep.
3
A survey on the effects of husbands' education of pregnant women on knowledge, attitude, and reducing elective cesarean section.
关于丈夫教育程度对孕妇知识、态度及减少选择性剖宫产影响的调查
J Educ Health Promot. 2013 Sep 30;2:50. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.119036. eCollection 2013.
4
Neonatal complications in public and private patients: a retrospective cohort study.公共和私人患者的新生儿并发症:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2013 May 28;3(5):e002786. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002786.
5
Role of public and private funding in the rising caesarean section rate: a cohort study.公共和私人资金在剖宫产率上升中的作用:一项队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2013 May 2;3(5):e002789. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002789.
6
Assisted vaginal deliveries in mothers admitted as public or private patients in Western Australia.在澳大利亚西部,以公立或私立患者身份入院的产妇的辅助阴道分娩。
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 16;8(4):e61699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061699. Print 2013.
7
Neonatal outcomes after preterm birth by mothers' health insurance status at birth: a retrospective cohort study.母亲出生时的医疗保险状况对早产儿出生后结局的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Feb 4;13:40. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-40.
8
Increase in caesarean deliveries after the Australian Private Health Insurance Incentive policy reforms.澳大利亚私人医疗保险激励政策改革后剖宫产率的增加。
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41436. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041436. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
9
Freestanding midwifery units versus obstetric units: does the effect of place of birth differ with level of social disadvantage?独立助产士单位与产科单位:分娩地点的效果是否因社会劣势程度而异?
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 22;12:478. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-478.
10
A statewide review of postnatal care in private hospitals in Victoria, Australia.澳大利亚维多利亚州私立医院产后护理的全州范围审查。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 May 28;10:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-26.