• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

代词化与语篇连贯、语篇结构及代词解释。

Pronominalization and discourse coherence, discourse structure and pronoun interpretation.

作者信息

Gordon P C, Scearce K A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 27599-3270, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1995 May;23(3):313-23. doi: 10.3758/bf03197233.

DOI:10.3758/bf03197233
PMID:7791600
Abstract

Two self-paced reading-time experiments are reported that examine the time course of pronoun interpretation processes based on local discourse structure and on world knowledge. The characterization of local discourse structure is based on recent work on centering, which provides a specific formulation of how the ways in which sentences make reference to common entities determines the coherence of discourse segments and how discourse structure influences interpretation of ambiguous pronouns. The results of the first experiment show that readers generate a default interpretation of a pronoun based on features of local discourse structure, and that that default interpretation is later confirmed or overridden by knowledge-based processes. The results of the second experiment show that local discourse structure continues to influence pronoun interpretation even when the semantic information that ultimately compels interpretation occurs before the pronoun. These results support the view that processes acting on local discourse structure play a powerful role in guiding language comprehension.

摘要

本文报告了两项自定步速阅读时间实验,这些实验基于局部话语结构和世界知识,考察了代词解释过程的时间进程。局部话语结构的刻画基于近期关于中心理论的研究,该理论具体阐述了句子提及共同实体的方式如何决定话语片段的连贯性,以及话语结构如何影响歧义代词的解释。第一个实验的结果表明,读者基于局部话语结构的特征生成代词的默认解释,并且该默认解释随后会被基于知识的过程所确认或推翻。第二个实验的结果表明,即使最终促使解释的语义信息出现在代词之前,局部话语结构仍会继续影响代词解释。这些结果支持了这样一种观点,即作用于局部话语结构的过程在引导语言理解方面发挥着重要作用。

相似文献

1
Pronominalization and discourse coherence, discourse structure and pronoun interpretation.代词化与语篇连贯、语篇结构及代词解释。
Mem Cognit. 1995 May;23(3):313-23. doi: 10.3758/bf03197233.
2
Pronoun resolution and discourse models.代词解析与语篇模型。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992 Mar;18(2):266-83. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.18.2.266.
3
Pronoun resolution without pronouns: some consequences of memory-based text processing.无代词的代词消解:基于记忆的文本处理的一些后果。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996 Jul;22(4):919-32. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.22.4.919.
4
How do Antecedent Semantics Influence Pronoun Interpretation? Evidence from Eye Movements.先行语义如何影响代词解释?来自眼动的证据。
Cogn Sci. 2023 Feb;47(2):e13251. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13251.
5
Shallow processing of ambiguous pronouns: evidence for delay.对歧义代词的浅层加工:延迟的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Dec;60(12):1680-96. doi: 10.1080/17470210601160807.
6
Effects of antecedent order and semantic context on Chinese pronoun resolution.先行词顺序和语义语境对汉语代词指代消解的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2000 Apr;28(3):427-38. doi: 10.3758/bf03198558.
7
Ambiguous pronoun resolution: contrasting the first-mention and subject-preference accounts.歧义代词解析:对比首次提及和主语偏好解释
Psychol Sci. 2005 Apr;16(4):260-4. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01525.x.
8
Coherent discourse solves the pronoun interpretation problem.连贯的语篇解决了代词指代问题。
J Child Lang. 2009 Jan;36(1):23-52. doi: 10.1017/S0305000908008854. Epub 2008 Sep 2.
9
The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphors.结构限制对代词和回指词解释的处理作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Jul;28(4):748-69. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.28.4.748.
10
Discourse models, pronoun resolution, and the implicit causality of verbs.话语模型、代词指代消解与动词的隐含因果关系
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993 Sep;19(5):1040-52. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.19.5.1040.

引用本文的文献

1
Processing Anaphoric Constructions: Insights from Electrophysiological Studies.处理指代结构:来自电生理研究的见解
J Neurolinguistics. 2008 May;21(3):231-266. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2007.10.002. Epub 2007 Dec 21.
2
Repetition Versus Variability in Verb Learning: Sometimes Less Is More.动词学习中的重复与变化:有时少即是多。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Nov 8;64(11):4235-4249. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00091. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
3
Incremental Language Comprehension Difficulty Predicts Activity in the Language Network but Not the Multiple Demand Network.

本文引用的文献

1
Accessing Sentence Participants: The Advantage of First Mention.获取句子参与者:首次提及的优势。
J Mem Lang. 1988 Dec;27(6):699-717. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90016-2.
2
A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension.一种阅读理论:从眼动注视到阅读理解。
Psychol Rev. 1980 Jul;87(4):329-54.
3
Active memory processes in visual sentence comprehension: clause effects and pronominal reference.视觉句子理解中的主动记忆过程:从句效应与代词指代
语言理解难度的逐渐增加可预测语言网络的活动,但不能预测多重需求网络的活动。
Cereb Cortex. 2021 Jul 29;31(9):4006-4023. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab065.
4
The Interaction of Contextual and Syntactic Information in the Processing of Turkish Anaphors.土耳其语指代语加工中语境信息与句法信息的相互作用
J Psycholinguist Res. 2017 Dec;46(6):1397-1425. doi: 10.1007/s10936-017-9502-2.
5
Focus takes time: structural effects on reading.专注力需要时间:阅读的结构效应
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Dec;22(6):1733-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0843-2.
6
Working memory and the revision of syntactic and discourse ambiguities.工作记忆与句法及语篇歧义的修正
Can J Exp Psychol. 2015 Mar;69(1):136-55. doi: 10.1037/cep0000037. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
7
Development of the first-mention bias.首因偏差的发展。
J Child Lang. 2015 Mar;42(2):423-46. doi: 10.1017/S0305000914000075. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
8
Memory availability and referential access.内存可用性和引用访问。
Lang Cogn Process. 2014 Jan 1;29(1):60-87. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2012.733014.
9
New is not always costly: evidence from online processing of topic and contrast in Japanese.新方法并不总是昂贵的:来自日语话题和对比在线处理的证据。
Front Psychol. 2013 Jun 28;4:363. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00363. Print 2013.
10
Coherence and Coreference Revisited.再谈连贯与指代
J Semant. 2008;25(1):1-44. doi: 10.1093/jos/ffm018. Epub 2007 Oct 9.
Mem Cognit. 1980 Jan;8(1):58-64. doi: 10.3758/bf03197552.
4
Pronoun disambiguation: accessing potential antecedents.代词消歧:获取潜在先行词。
Mem Cognit. 1983 May;11(3):283-94. doi: 10.3758/bf03196975.
5
Evidence for an anaphoric mechanism within syntactic processing: some reference relations defy semantic and pragmatic constraints.句法处理中照应机制的证据:一些指代关系违背语义和语用限制。
Mem Cognit. 1987 Jul;15(4):318-31. doi: 10.3758/bf03197034.
6
Antecedent search processes and the structure of text.先行搜索过程与文本结构。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1987 Apr;13(2):278-90. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.13.2.278.
7
Mechanisms that improve referential access.改善指代访问的机制。
Cognition. 1989 Jul;32(2):99-156. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(89)90001-2.
8
The use of heuristic strategies in the interpretation of pronouns.启发式策略在代词解释中的应用。
J Psycholinguist Res. 1990 Jul;19(4):245-64. doi: 10.1007/BF01077259.
9
Pronoun resolution and discourse models.代词解析与语篇模型。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992 Mar;18(2):266-83. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.18.2.266.
10
Inference during reading.阅读过程中的推理。
Psychol Rev. 1992 Jul;99(3):440-66. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.99.3.440.