Fatovich D M, Jacobs I G
Department of Emergency Medicine, Swan District Hospital, Western Australia.
Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Feb;25(2):209-14. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70326-8.
To evaluate the efficacy of oral midazolam (0.3 mg/kg) and buffered lidocaine in reducing the anxiety associated with the repair of childhood lacerations.
Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Community-based emergency department.
Children younger than 10 years.
Each subject was randomized into one of four treatment groups: A, midazolam and buffered lidocaine (n = 25); B, placebo and buffered lidocaine (n = 27); C, midazolam and plain lidocaine (n = 32); and D, placebo and plain lidocaine (n = 23).
Anxiety level was scored on a scale of 1 to 4 on the basis of predetermined behavior criteria before and during repair. Parents independently rated the child's distress using a visual analog scale. Vital signs were measured on admission and at discharge. There were no significant differences among the treatment groups for age, location and length of laceration, or initial anxiety scores. Midazolam decreased the number of children with anxiety levels 3 and 4 by 24% (95% CI, 7.5% to 41.3%). There was a 33% reduction of the parents' distress rating with midazolam (P < .01). Buffered lidocaine had no effect on anxiety level.
Oral midazolam (0.3 mg/kg) is a safe and effective treatment for reducing anxiety during the suturing of lacerations in children less than 10 years of age. In this study, buffered lidocaine had no effect on anxiety level.
评估口服咪达唑仑(0.3毫克/千克)和缓冲利多卡因在减轻儿童裂伤修复相关焦虑方面的疗效。
前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
社区急诊科。
10岁以下儿童。
将每名受试者随机分为四个治疗组之一:A组,咪达唑仑和缓冲利多卡因(n = 25);B组,安慰剂和缓冲利多卡因(n = 27);C组,咪达唑仑和普通利多卡因(n = 32);D组,安慰剂和普通利多卡因(n = 23)。
根据修复前和修复过程中预先确定的行为标准,焦虑水平按1至4分进行评分。父母使用视觉模拟量表独立评估孩子的痛苦程度。入院时和出院时测量生命体征。各治疗组在年龄、裂伤部位和长度或初始焦虑评分方面无显著差异。咪达唑仑使焦虑水平为3级和4级的儿童数量减少了24%(95%可信区间,7.5%至41.3%)。使用咪达唑仑后,父母的痛苦评分降低了33%(P <.01)。缓冲利多卡因对焦虑水平无影响。
口服咪达唑仑(0.3毫克/千克)是一种安全有效的治疗方法,可减轻10岁以下儿童裂伤缝合过程中的焦虑。在本研究中,缓冲利多卡因对焦虑水平无影响。