• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强制选择。一项提高公众对器官捐赠承诺度的计划。

Mandated choice. A plan to increase public commitment to organ donation.

作者信息

Spital A

机构信息

University of Rochester School of Medicine, NY.

出版信息

JAMA. 1995 Feb 8;273(6):504-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.273.6.504.

DOI:10.1001/jama.273.6.504
PMID:7837372
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the impact of mandated choice--a system that requires competent adults to decide prospectively whether or not they wish to be organ donors when they die--on public commitment to organ donation; and to explore who is best suited to provide consent--the family or the individual?

DESIGN

A national, random-digit telephone survey conducted by the Gallup Organization in July 1993.

PARTICIPANTS

A representative sample (n = 1002) of adults (aged 18 years and older) living in homes with telephones in the continental United States.

RESULTS

Although the majority of respondents had given at least some thought to organ donation, only 25% had carefully considered this issue. Overall, 30% had decided to donate, but 58% were undecided and only 38% had made their wishes known to a family member. Yet the vast majority (82%) believes that the best way to obtain consent is for each adult to decide for himself or herself, rather than leaving this decision for the family. Under mandated choice, which is designed to encourage such self-determination, 63% would sign up to donate, 24% would not, and 13% were unsure.

CONCLUSIONS

Only a small fraction of the US public is currently committed to organ donation and relatively few people have carefully considered and communicated their wishes regarding this important issue. Therefore, the difficult question of consent is often left for the family. Yet most people believe that ideally all adults should answer this question for themselves, in contrast to our present family-oriented approach, but consistent with the design of mandated choice. If mandated choice became law, it appears that most adults would sign up to donate, thereby increasing the pool of desperately needed committed donors.

摘要

目的

评估强制选择(一种要求有行为能力的成年人预先决定自己死后是否愿意成为器官捐献者的制度)对公众器官捐献意愿的影响;并探讨由谁来提供同意更为合适——是家属还是个人?

设计

1993年7月由盖洛普组织进行的一项全国性随机数字电话调查。

参与者

居住在美国本土有电话家庭中的18岁及以上成年人的代表性样本(n = 1002)。

结果

尽管大多数受访者至少对器官捐献有所考虑,但只有25%的人仔细考虑过这个问题。总体而言,30%的人已决定捐献,但58%的人尚未决定,只有38%的人已将自己的意愿告知家人。然而,绝大多数人(82%)认为获得同意的最佳方式是让每个成年人自己做决定,而不是由家人来做这个决定。在旨在鼓励这种自我决定的强制选择制度下,63%的人会登记成为捐献者,24%的人不会,13%的人不确定。

结论

目前美国公众中只有一小部分人致力于器官捐献,相对较少的人仔细考虑并表达了他们在这个重要问题上的意愿。因此,同意这个难题往往留给了家属。然而,大多数人认为理想情况下所有成年人都应该自己回答这个问题,这与我们目前以家庭为导向的方式不同,但与强制选择的设计一致。如果强制选择成为法律,似乎大多数成年人会登记成为捐献者,从而增加急需的志愿捐献者群体。

相似文献

1
Mandated choice. A plan to increase public commitment to organ donation.强制选择。一项提高公众对器官捐赠承诺度的计划。
JAMA. 1995 Feb 8;273(6):504-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.273.6.504.
2
Mandated choice. The preferred solution to the organ shortage?强制选择。解决器官短缺问题的首选方案?
Arch Intern Med. 1992 Dec;152(12):2421-4. doi: 10.1001/archinte.152.12.2421.
3
Mandated choice for organ donation: time to give it a try.器官捐赠强制选择:是时候尝试一下了。
Ann Intern Med. 1996 Jul 1;125(1):66-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-1-199607010-00010.
4
Who are the donors in organ donation? The family's perspective in mandated choice.器官捐赠中的捐赠者是谁?家庭在强制选择中的观点。
Ann Intern Med. 1996 Jul 1;125(1):70-3. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-1-199607010-00011.
5
The consent process for cadaveric organ procurement: how does it work? How can it be improved?尸体器官获取的同意程序:它是如何运作的?如何加以改进?
JAMA. 2001 Jan 17;285(3):329-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.3.329.
6
Public attitudes and behavior regarding organ donation.公众对器官捐赠的态度和行为。
JAMA. 1985 Jun 7;253(21):3111-5.
7
Organ procurement and mandated choice: an alternative to the existing system.器官获取与强制选择:现有系统的一种替代方案。
Princet J Bioeth. 2000 Spring;3(1):70-80.
8
Modified mandated choice for organ procurement.器官获取的改良强制选择
J Med Ethics. 2003 Jun;29(3):157-62. doi: 10.1136/jme.29.3.157.
9
Strategies for cadaveric organ procurement. Mandated choice and presumed consent. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association.尸体器官获取策略。强制选择与推定同意。美国医学协会伦理与司法事务委员会。
JAMA. 1994 Sep 14;272(10):809-12.
10
Mandated choice for organ donation.器官捐赠的强制选择。
JAMA. 1995 Sep 27;274(12):942-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Population Health Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies in Adults Aged 45 to 49 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial.45至49岁成年人的群体健康结直肠癌筛查策略:一项随机临床试验
JAMA. 2025 Aug 4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.12049.
2
The effect of a mandatory choice systemfor organ donation after brain death onethical legitimacy and potential efficacyin a mathematical model.脑死亡后器官捐赠强制选择系统在数学模型中的伦理合法性及潜在效果
Korean J Transplant. 2020 Mar 31;34(1):2-7. doi: 10.4285/kjt.2020.34.1.2.
3
Active Choice Intervention Increases Advance Directive Completion: A Randomized Trial.
主动选择干预可提高预立医疗指示的完成率:一项随机试验。
MDM Policy Pract. 2018 Feb 20;3(1):2381468317753127. doi: 10.1177/2381468317753127. eCollection 2018 Jan-Jun.
4
Tolerant Paternalism: Pro-ethical Design as a Resolution of the Dilemma of Toleration.宽容家长主义:作为解决宽容困境之法的亲伦理设计
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Dec;22(6):1669-1688. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9733-2. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
5
APPLYING INSIGHTS FROM BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS TO POLICY DESIGN.将行为经济学的见解应用于政策设计。
Annu Rev Econom. 2014 Aug;6:663-688. doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-041033.
6
Modified mandated choice for organ procurement.器官获取的改良强制选择
J Med Ethics. 2003 Jun;29(3):157-62. doi: 10.1136/jme.29.3.157.
7
Meeting the demand for donor organs in the US. It's time for bold public policy, such as mandated choice or presumed consent.满足美国对捐赠器官的需求。是时候出台大胆的公共政策了,比如强制选择或推定同意。
BMJ. 1999 Nov 27;319(7222):1382-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7222.1382.
8
Marketing human organs: the autonomy paradox.人体器官买卖:自主性悖论。
Theor Med. 1996 Mar;17(1):1-18. doi: 10.1007/BF00489737.