Sabria-Leal M, Morthland V H, Pedro-Botet M L, Sopena N, Gimenez-Perez M, Branchini M L, Pfaller M A
Department of Pathology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland.
Eur J Epidemiol. 1994 Jun;10(3):325-30. doi: 10.1007/BF01719357.
Subtyping isolates may be useful for epidemiological studies of methicillin-resistant-Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) outbreaks. Among subtyping methods, DNA-based techniques have been applied very effectively for this purpose. An outbreak of MRSA infections took place in one hospital in Barcelona early during 1991. From the beginning of the outbreak to December 92, 70 MRSA isolates from different patients and sources were collected. All strains were evaluated by restriction endonuclease analysis of plasmid DNA (REAP) and macrorestriction endonuclease analysis of genomic DNA using Sma I and pulsed-field-gel-electrophoresis (PFGE). Plasmid screening and REAP using Hind III demonstrated two plasmid subtypes: subtype A showing a large plasmid, and subtype B showing the same large plasmid plus a smaller one. Subtypes A and B corresponded to the more recent and older isolates, respectively, suggesting the loss of the small plasmid during the epidemic. PFGE using Sma I displayed two closely related profiles (PFGE subtype A and A'; CS = 0.90). These subtypes were different from those subtypes exhibited from 4 methicillin-susceptible-Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) isolates from the same hospital and from 2 epidemiologically unrelated MRSA isolates. Almost all isolates showing PFGE subtype A preceded those isolates showing PFGE subtype A'. This fact and the similarity between both subtypes suggested minor chromosomal DNA rearrangement during the outbreak from a unique strain. While PFGE using Sma I is a useful tool in evaluation of clonal dissemination, our data suggest epidemic or local outbreaks may need several methods to best delineate the source and spread of MRSA strains. The reproducibility and discriminatory power of REAP makes it a useful adjunct in this context.
对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)暴发进行亚型分析可能有助于开展流行病学研究。在各种亚型分析方法中,基于DNA的技术已被非常有效地应用于这一目的。1991年初,巴塞罗那的一家医院发生了MRSA感染暴发。从暴发开始到1992年12月,共收集了来自不同患者和来源的70株MRSA分离株。所有菌株均通过质粒DNA的限制性内切酶分析(REAP)以及使用Sma I和脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)对基因组DNA进行的宏观限制性内切酶分析进行评估。使用Hind III进行质粒筛选和REAP显示出两种质粒亚型:A亚型显示一个大质粒,B亚型显示相同的大质粒外加一个较小的质粒。A亚型和B亚型分别对应于较新的和较老的分离株,这表明在流行过程中小质粒丢失了。使用Sma I的PFGE显示出两种密切相关的图谱(PFGE亚型A和A';相似系数=0.90)。这些亚型与来自同一家医院的4株甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)分离株以及2株流行病学上无关的MRSA分离株所显示的亚型不同。几乎所有显示PFGE亚型A的分离株都先于显示PFGE亚型A'的分离株出现。这一事实以及两种亚型之间的相似性表明,在暴发过程中,一个独特菌株发生了轻微的染色体DNA重排。虽然使用Sma I的PFGE是评估克隆传播的有用工具,但我们的数据表明,对于流行或局部暴发,可能需要几种方法来最好地描绘MRSA菌株的来源和传播。REAP的可重复性和鉴别能力使其在此背景下成为一种有用的辅助手段。