• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尺度对鸟类和蝙蝠翼骨应力及安全系数的影响。

Scale effects on the stresses and safety factors in the wing bones of birds and bats.

作者信息

Kirkpatrick S J

机构信息

Department of Biology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124.

出版信息

J Exp Biol. 1994 May;190:195-215. doi: 10.1242/jeb.190.1.195.

DOI:10.1242/jeb.190.1.195
PMID:7964391
Abstract

The effects of scale on the estimated stresses and safety factors in the humeri of several bird and bat species were investigated. This was accomplished by estimating the lift distribution across the wings at two extremes of flight, gliding flight and the downstroke in hovering, finding the center of lift on the wings at these two extremes and calculating the applied bending and twisting moments. This information, along with measurements of mechanically important morphological variables, allowed for estimates of bending and shearing stresses in the humeri for both gliding flight and on the downstroke in hovering. The stresses in flapping flight other than hovering should fall somewhere between these two values. It was found that the stresses in the humeri are not scale-dependent and that the bending stresses are slightly lower than those found in the limbs of terrestrial animals, while the shearing stresses are larger than those in terrestrial limbs. The breaking stress of bird and bat wing bone was also investigated. Both materials were found to have a lower breaking stress than that of typical long bone material. The ratio between the breaking stress of the material and the estimated stresses was defined as the safety factor. Bird humeri have safety factors that are generally greater than those of bat humeri. This is because bat bone has a lower breaking stress than does bird bone, although the estimated stresses in the wings are similar. The mean safety factor against failure due to bending in gliding flight was 6.63 for birds and 3.99 for bats. In hovering, the mean safety factors against failure due to bending were 2.22 for birds and 1.41 for bats. The safety factors against failure due to shearing stresses were estimated to be seven times greater than those against failure due to pure bending stresses.

摘要

研究了体型大小对几种鸟类和蝙蝠肱骨估计应力及安全系数的影响。通过估计在两种极端飞行状态下(滑翔飞行和悬停时的下拍)翅膀上的升力分布,找到这两种极端状态下翅膀上的升力中心,并计算施加的弯曲和扭转力矩来实现这一研究。这些信息,连同对机械上重要的形态变量的测量,使得能够估计滑翔飞行和悬停时下拍时肱骨的弯曲和剪切应力。除悬停外的扑翼飞行中的应力应介于这两个值之间。研究发现,肱骨中的应力与体型大小无关,弯曲应力略低于陆生动物肢体中的应力,而剪切应力则大于陆生肢体中的应力。还研究了鸟类和蝙蝠翼骨的断裂应力。发现这两种材料的断裂应力均低于典型长骨材料的断裂应力。材料的断裂应力与估计应力之比被定义为安全系数。鸟类肱骨的安全系数通常大于蝙蝠肱骨的安全系数。这是因为尽管翅膀中的估计应力相似,但蝙蝠骨骼的断裂应力低于鸟类骨骼。鸟类在滑翔飞行中因弯曲而失效的平均安全系数为6.63,蝙蝠为3.99。在悬停时,鸟类因弯曲而失效的平均安全系数为2.22,蝙蝠为1.41。因剪切应力而失效的安全系数估计比因纯弯曲应力而失效的安全系数大七倍。

相似文献

1
Scale effects on the stresses and safety factors in the wing bones of birds and bats.尺度对鸟类和蝙蝠翼骨应力及安全系数的影响。
J Exp Biol. 1994 May;190:195-215. doi: 10.1242/jeb.190.1.195.
2
How oscillating aerodynamic forces explain the timbre of the hummingbird's hum and other animals in flapping flight.振波空气动力如何解释蜂鸟嗡嗡声和其他拍打飞行动物的音色。
Elife. 2021 Mar 16;10:e63107. doi: 10.7554/eLife.63107.
3
Collagen fiber orientation pattern, osteon morphology and distribution, and presence of laminar histology do not distinguish torsion from bending in bat and pigeon wing bones.胶原纤维取向模式、骨单位形态和分布以及层状组织学的存在并不能区分蝙蝠和鸽子翅膀骨骼中的扭转与弯曲。
J Anat. 2019 Jun;234(6):748-763. doi: 10.1111/joa.12981. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
4
The dynamics of hovering flight in hummingbirds, insects and bats with implications for aerial robotics.蜂鸟、昆虫和蝙蝠的悬停飞行动力学及其对空中机器人的启示。
Bioinspir Biomim. 2018 Nov 9;14(1):016003. doi: 10.1088/1748-3190/aaea56.
5
Bat flight: aerodynamics, kinematics and flight morphology.蝙蝠飞行:空气动力学、运动学与飞行形态学
J Exp Biol. 2015 Mar;218(Pt 5):653-63. doi: 10.1242/jeb.031203.
6
A quantitative comparison of bird and bat wakes.鸟类和蝙蝠尾流的定量比较。
J R Soc Interface. 2010 Jan 6;7(42):61-6. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2008.0541. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
7
Cross sectional geometry of the forelimb skeleton and flight mode in pelecaniform birds.鹈形目鸟类前肢骨骼的横截面几何形状与飞行模式
J Morphol. 2011 Aug;272(8):958-71. doi: 10.1002/jmor.10963. Epub 2011 May 12.
8
Aerodynamic flight performance in flap-gliding birds and bats.翼滑翔鸟类和蝙蝠的空气动力学飞行性能。
J Theor Biol. 2012 Aug 7;306:120-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.04.014. Epub 2012 May 1.
9
Flapping wing aerodynamics: from insects to vertebrates.扑翼空气动力学:从昆虫到脊椎动物
J Exp Biol. 2016 Apr;219(Pt 7):920-32. doi: 10.1242/jeb.042317.
10
Efficiency of lift production in flapping and gliding flight of swifts.雨燕扑翼飞行和滑翔飞行中升力产生的效率
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 28;9(2):e90170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090170. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
How did extinct giant birds and pterosaurs fly? A comprehensive modeling approach to evaluate soaring performance.已灭绝的巨型鸟类和翼龙是如何飞行的?一种评估翱翔性能的综合建模方法。
PNAS Nexus. 2022 Mar 10;1(1):pgac023. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac023. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Inspiration for wing design: how forelimb specialization enables active flight in modern vertebrates.翅膀设计的灵感:前肢特化如何使现代脊椎动物实现主动飞行。
J R Soc Interface. 2017 Jun;14(131). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0240. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
3
Upstroke wing flexion and the inertial cost of bat flight.
翼上挥动机翼弯曲和蝙蝠飞行的惯性成本。
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 7;279(1740):2945-50. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.0346. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
4
On the size and flight diversity of giant pterosaurs, the use of birds as pterosaur analogues and comments on pterosaur flightlessness.关于巨型翼龙的体型和飞行多样性、将鸟类用作翼龙的模拟物以及对翼龙不能飞行的评论。
PLoS One. 2010 Nov 15;5(11):e13982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013982.
5
Biomechanics of the unique pterosaur pteroid.翼龙独特翼膜的生物力学
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Apr 7;277(1684):1121-7. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1899. Epub 2009 Dec 9.
6
Laminar bone as an adaptation to torsional loads in flapping flight.层状骨作为对扑翼飞行中扭转载荷的一种适应性结构。
J Anat. 2002 Dec;201(6):521-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2002.00118.x.