• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同磁共振场强下脑肿瘤的对比增强:0.5T与2.0T的比较

Contrast enhancement of brain tumors at different MR field strengths: comparison of 0.5 T and 2.0 T.

作者信息

Chang K H, Ra D G, Han M H, Cha S H, Kim H D, Han M C

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994 Sep;15(8):1413-9; discussion 1420-3.

PMID:7985558
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8334418/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the degree of MR contrast enhancement of 0.5 T and 2.0 T in various brain tumors.

METHODS

MR images were studied prospectively in each of 31 patients with brain tumors (11 gliomas, 6 meningiomas, 6 neurinomas, and 8 others) before and after intravenous injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine. In every patient, both 0.5-T and 2.0-T MR studies were done within 1 week. Each patient received an initial standard dose (0.1 mmol/kg) of gadopentetate dimeglumine, followed by a subsequent 0.1-mmol/kg dose (total, double dose) in MR of each field strength. MR was done before and after each injection of the contrast agent. Degree of contrast enhancement in the lesions was assessed both visually and quantitatively.

RESULTS

With standard-dose study, the tumor enhancement was visually stronger at 2.0 T than at 0.5 T in 9 gliomas. In extraaxial tumors there was visually no or minimal difference between 0.5 T and 2.0 T. Overall mean contrast-enhancement ratio and tumor and brain contrast-to-noise ratio were higher at 2.0 T than at 0.5 T by 53% and 108%, respectively. The double-dose study showed higher contrast-enhancement ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio than the standard-dose study at both field strengths, and the differences between 0.5 T and 2.0 T were almost similar to those of the standard-dose study. The degree of contrast enhancement with the standard dose at 2.0 T was comparable to that of the double dose at 0.5 T in most intraaxial tumors.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that effect of contrast enhancement increases with the field strength. Therefore, reevaluation of optimal doses of contrast media may be needed in a variety of brain lesions at each field strength.

摘要

目的

比较0.5T和2.0T磁共振成像(MRI)对各种脑肿瘤的对比增强程度。

方法

对31例脑肿瘤患者(11例胶质瘤、6例脑膜瘤、6例神经鞘瘤和8例其他肿瘤)进行前瞻性研究,在静脉注射钆喷酸葡胺前后进行MRI检查。每位患者在1周内分别进行了0.5T和2.0T的MRI检查。每位患者先接受初始标准剂量(0.1mmol/kg)的钆喷酸葡胺,然后在每个场强的MRI检查中再给予0.1mmol/kg剂量(总剂量为双倍剂量)。在每次注射造影剂前后进行MRI检查。通过视觉和定量评估病变的对比增强程度。

结果

在标准剂量研究中,9例胶质瘤在2.0T时的肿瘤增强在视觉上比0.5T时更强。在脑外肿瘤中,0.5T和2.0T之间在视觉上无差异或差异极小。总体平均对比增强率以及肿瘤与脑的对比噪声比在2.0T时分别比0.5T时高53%和108%。双倍剂量研究显示,在两个场强下,对比增强率和对比噪声比均高于标准剂量研究,且0.5T和2.0T之间的差异与标准剂量研究几乎相似。在大多数脑内肿瘤中,2.0T时标准剂量的对比增强程度与0.5T时双倍剂量的相当。

结论

结果表明,对比增强效果随场强增加。因此,可能需要重新评估每种场强下各种脑病变的造影剂最佳剂量。

相似文献

1
Contrast enhancement of brain tumors at different MR field strengths: comparison of 0.5 T and 2.0 T.不同磁共振场强下脑肿瘤的对比增强:0.5T与2.0T的比较
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994 Sep;15(8):1413-9; discussion 1420-3.
2
MRI evaluation of "solitary" brain metastases with triple-dose gadoteridol: comparison with contrast-enhanced CT and conventional-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine MRI studies in the same patients.使用三倍剂量钆特醇对“孤立性”脑转移瘤进行MRI评估:与同一患者的对比增强CT及常规剂量钆喷酸葡胺MRI研究的比较
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1994 Sep-Oct;18(5):391-9. doi: 10.1016/0895-6111(94)90011-6.
3
Dose of contrast material in the MR imaging evaluation of central nervous system tumors.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 1994 May-Jun;4(3):243-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880040304.
4
MR diagnosis of head and neck tumors: comparison of contrast enhancement with triple-dose gadodiamide and standard-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine in the same patients.头颈部肿瘤的磁共振成像诊断:同一患者使用三倍剂量钆双胺和标准剂量钆喷酸葡胺的对比增强比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Aug;163(2):425-32. doi: 10.2214/ajr.163.2.8037044.
5
Echo-planar MR determination of relative cerebral blood volume in human brain tumors: T1 versus T2 weighting.回波平面磁共振成像测定人脑肿瘤中的相对脑血容量:T1加权与T2加权对比
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996 May;17(5):831-40.
6
Effect of dose and field strength on enhancement with paramagnetic contrast media.剂量和场强对顺磁性造影剂增强效果的影响。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994 Nov;15(10):1849-52.
7
MR evaluation of CNS tumors: dose comparison study with gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadoteridol.中枢神经系统肿瘤的磁共振成像评估:钆喷酸葡胺与钆特醇的剂量比较研究
Radiology. 1991 Aug;180(2):485-91. doi: 10.1148/radiology.180.2.2068317.
8
A comparative study on contrast enhancement between 0.5- and 2.0-Tesla field strength in rabbit VX2 carcinomas.
Invest Radiol. 1995 May;30(5):291-5. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199505000-00004.
9
Comparative evaluation of lesion enhancement using 1 M gadobutrol vs. 2 conventional gadolinium chelates, all at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg, in a rat brain tumor model at 3 T.在3T条件下,对大鼠脑肿瘤模型中使用剂量均为0.1 mmol/kg的1M钆布醇与2种传统钆螯合物进行病变强化的比较评估。
Invest Radiol. 2009 May;44(5):251-6. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31819ba711.
10
Comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) with gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) for enhanced MR imaging of brain and spine tumours in children.钆布醇(Gd-BOPTA)与钆喷酸葡胺(Gd-DTPA)用于儿童脑和脊柱肿瘤增强磁共振成像的比较。
Pediatr Radiol. 2005 May;35(5):501-10. doi: 10.1007/s00247-004-1392-4. Epub 2005 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Consensus recommendations on standardized magnetic resonance imaging protocols for multicenter canine brain tumor clinical trials.多中心犬脑肿瘤临床试验标准化磁共振成像方案的共识性建议。
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2018 May;59(3):261-271. doi: 10.1111/vru.12608. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
2
Brain tumours at 7T MRI compared to 3T--contrast effect after half and full standard contrast agent dose: initial results.7T磁共振成像与3T磁共振成像对脑肿瘤的诊断比较——半量和全量标准造影剂剂量后的对比效果:初步结果
Eur Radiol. 2015 Jan;25(1):106-12. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3351-2. Epub 2014 Sep 7.
3
Combining atlas-based parcellation of regional brain data acquired across scanners at 1.5 T and 3.0 T field strengths.结合基于图谱的区域脑数据分割,这些数据是在 1.5T 和 3.0T 场强下从不同扫描仪获得的。
Neuroimage. 2012 Apr 2;60(2):940-51. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.092. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
4
Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging and potential therapeutic applications in neurooncology and central nervous system inflammatory pathologies, a review.超顺磁性氧化铁纳米颗粒:神经肿瘤学和中枢神经系统炎症性病变中的诊断磁共振成像及潜在治疗应用,综述。
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010 Jan;30(1):15-35. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2009.192. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
5
The optimal use of contrast agents at high field MRI.高场磁共振成像中对比剂的优化使用
Eur Radiol. 2006 Jun;16(6):1280-7. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0154-0. Epub 2006 Mar 1.
6
[Use of contrast agent in high-field MRI (3 T)].[对比剂在高场强磁共振成像(3T)中的应用]
Radiologe. 2004 Jan;44(1):56-64. doi: 10.1007/s00117-003-0964-x.