Rich-Edwards J W, Corsano K A, Stampfer M J
Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Dec 1;140(11):1016-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117191.
The authors compared the ability of the National Death Index and the Equifax Nationwide Death Search to ascertain deaths of participants in the Nurses' Health Study. Each service was sent information on 197 participants aged 60-68 years in 1989 whose deaths were reported by kin or postal authorities and 1,997 participants of the same age who were known to be alive. Neither service was aware of the authors' information regarding participants' vital status. The sensitivity of the National Death Index was 98 percent and that of Equifax was 79 percent. Sensitivity was similar for women aged 65-68 years; however, for women aged 61-64 years, the sensitivity of the National Death Index was 97.7 percent compared with 60.2 percent for Equifax. The specificity of both services was approximately 100 percent. The contrast between the sources of these databases and the matching algorithms they employ has implications for researchers and for those planning health data systems.
作者比较了国家死亡指数和益百利全国死亡搜索确定护士健康研究参与者死亡情况的能力。1989年,向这两项服务机构分别发送了197名年龄在60 - 68岁的参与者信息,这些参与者的死亡由亲属或邮政当局报告,以及1997名已知在世的同年龄段参与者信息。两项服务机构均不知晓作者关于参与者生命状态的信息。国家死亡指数的敏感度为98%,益百利的敏感度为79%。65 - 68岁女性的敏感度相似;然而,对于61 - 64岁女性,国家死亡指数的敏感度为97.7%,而益百利为60.2%。两项服务的特异度均约为100%。这些数据库的来源及其采用的匹配算法之间的差异对研究人员和规划健康数据系统的人员具有启示意义。