Durham R C, Murphy T, Allan T, Richard K, Treliving L R, Fenton G W
Tayside Area Clinical Psychology Department, Royal Dundee Liff Hospital.
Br J Psychiatry. 1994 Sep;165(3):315-23. doi: 10.1192/bjp.165.3.315.
We test the hypotheses that (a) cognitive therapy is of comparable efficacy to psychodynamic psychotherapy, (b) 8-10 sessions of therapy is as effective as 16-20 sessions, and (c) brief therapist training is as effective as intensive training.
Of 178 out-patients referred to a clinical trial of psychological treatment for generalised anxiety, 110 patients met DSM-III-R criteria for generalised anxiety disorder and were randomly assigned to three different forms of psychotherapy. The main comparison was between cognitive therapy and analytic psychotherapy, delivered by experienced therapists at weekly or fortnightly intervals over six months. A third treatment, anxiety management training, was delivered at fortnightly intervals by registrars in psychiatry after a brief period of training. Eighty patients completed treatment and were assessed before treatment, after treatment, and at six-month follow-up.
Cognitive therapy was significantly more effective than analytic psychotherapy, with about 50% of patients considerably better at follow-up. Analytic psychotherapy gave significant improvement but to a lesser degree than cognitive therapy. There was no significant effect for level of contact. Patients receiving anxiety management training showed similar improvements to cognitive therapy after treatment, with rather lower proportions showing clinically significant change.
Cognitive therapy is likely to be more effective than psychodynamic psychotherapy with chronically anxious patients. Significant improvements in symptoms can be achieved by trainee psychiatrists after only brief instruction in behaviourally based anxiety management. However, the superiority of cognitive therapy at follow-up suggests that the greater investment of resources required for this approach is likely to pay off in terms of more sustained improvement. There is no evidence that 16-20 sessions of treatment is more effective, on average, than 8-10 sessions.
我们检验以下假设:(a)认知疗法与心理动力心理治疗疗效相当;(b)8 - 10次治疗与16 - 20次治疗效果相同;(c)简短的治疗师培训与强化培训效果相同。
在178名被转介至一项广泛性焦虑心理治疗临床试验的门诊患者中,110名患者符合DSM - III - R广泛性焦虑障碍标准,并被随机分配至三种不同形式的心理治疗。主要比较认知疗法和分析性心理治疗,由经验丰富的治疗师每隔一周或两周进行一次,为期六个月。第三种治疗方法是焦虑管理训练,由精神科住院医生在经过短暂培训后每隔两周进行一次。80名患者完成了治疗,并在治疗前、治疗后及六个月随访时接受评估。
认知疗法显著优于分析性心理治疗,约50%的患者在随访时病情有显著改善。分析性心理治疗有显著改善,但程度低于认知疗法。治疗接触频率没有显著影响。接受焦虑管理训练的患者在治疗后表现出与认知疗法相似的改善,但临床显著变化的比例相对较低。
对于慢性焦虑患者,认知疗法可能比心理动力心理治疗更有效。实习精神科医生仅经过基于行为的焦虑管理简短培训后,症状就能有显著改善。然而,认知疗法在随访时的优势表明,这种方法所需的更多资源投入可能会在更持续的改善方面得到回报。没有证据表明平均而言,16 - 20次治疗比8 - 10次治疗更有效。