Suppr超能文献

棒酸、舒巴坦和他唑巴坦对临床重要β-内酰胺酶的比较活性。

Comparative activities of clavulanic acid, sulbactam, and tazobactam against clinically important beta-lactamases.

作者信息

Payne D J, Cramp R, Winstanley D J, Knowles D J

机构信息

SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Betchworth, Surrey, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 Apr;38(4):767-72. doi: 10.1128/AAC.38.4.767.

Abstract

Clavulanic acid, sulbactam, and tazobactam are inhibitors of a variety of plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases. However, inhibition data for these three inhibitors with a wide range of different plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases have not yet been compared under the same experimental conditions. A number of groups have inferred that clavulanic acid inhibits extended-spectrum TEM and SHV beta-lactamases, but inhibition data have rarely been published. In this study, the 50% inhibitory concentrations of these three beta-lactamase inhibitors for 35 plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases have been determined. Of these 35 beta-lactamases, 20 were extended-spectrum TEM- or SHV-derived beta-lactamases. The other 15 enzymes were conventional-spectrum beta-lactamases such as TEM-1 and SHV-1. Clavulanic acid was a more potent inhibitor than sulbactam for 32 of the 35 plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases tested. In particular, clavulanic acid was 60 and 580 times more potent than sulbactam against TEM-1 and SHV-1, respectively, currently the two most clinically prevalent gram-negative plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases. Statistical analysis of the data of the 50% inhibitory concentrations showed that clavulanic acid was 20 times more active overall than sulbactam against the conventional-spectrum enzymes. In addition, clavulanic acid was 14 times more potent than sulbactam at inhibiting the extended-spectrum enzymes. Tazobactam also showed significantly greater activity than sulbactam against the two groups of beta-lactamases. There were no significant differences between the overall activities of tazobactam and clavulanic acid against the extended-spectrum TEM and SHV enzymes and conventional-spectrum enzymes, although differences in their inhibition profiles were observed.

摘要

克拉维酸、舒巴坦和他唑巴坦是多种质粒介导的β-内酰胺酶的抑制剂。然而,这三种抑制剂对多种不同质粒介导的β-内酰胺酶的抑制数据尚未在相同实验条件下进行比较。许多研究小组推断克拉维酸可抑制超广谱TEM和SHVβ-内酰胺酶,但相关抑制数据很少发表。在本研究中,已测定了这三种β-内酰胺酶抑制剂对35种质粒介导的β-内酰胺酶的50%抑制浓度。在这35种β-内酰胺酶中,20种是超广谱TEM或SHV衍生的β-内酰胺酶。另外15种酶是常规谱β-内酰胺酶,如TEM-1和SHV-1。对于所测试的35种质粒介导的β-内酰胺酶中的32种,克拉维酸是比舒巴坦更有效的抑制剂。特别是,克拉维酸对TEM-1和SHV-1的抑制效力分别比舒巴坦高60倍和580倍,而TEM-1和SHV-1是目前临床上最常见的两种革兰氏阴性质粒介导的β-内酰胺酶。对50%抑制浓度数据的统计分析表明,总体而言,克拉维酸对常规谱酶的活性比舒巴坦高20倍。此外,克拉维酸在抑制超广谱酶方面比舒巴坦强14倍。他唑巴坦对两组β-内酰胺酶的活性也明显高于舒巴坦。他唑巴坦和克拉维酸对超广谱TEM和SHV酶以及常规谱酶的总体活性之间没有显著差异,尽管观察到它们的抑制谱有所不同。

相似文献

1
Comparative activities of clavulanic acid, sulbactam, and tazobactam against clinically important beta-lactamases.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 Apr;38(4):767-72. doi: 10.1128/AAC.38.4.767.
8
Effect of beta-lactamase inhibitors on beta-lactamases from anaerobic bacteria.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Nov;11(11):1100-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01967805.
10
Effect of pH on activities of novel beta-lactamases and beta-lactamase inhibitors against these beta-lactamases.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Aug;39(8):1856-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.8.1856.

引用本文的文献

1
False equivalence: differences in the activity of ampicillin-sulbactam and amoxicillin-clavulanate in several Enterobacterales species.
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2025 Sep 4;7(5):dlaf147. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaf147. eCollection 2025 Oct.
2
Navigating the Muddled Middle: A Case-Based Exploration of Oral β-Lactams for Systemic Gram-Negative Infections.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Sep 3;12(9):ofaf435. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf435. eCollection 2025 Sep.
3
Quantification of β-Lactamase Inhibition Using a Luminescent Whole-Cell Biosensor.
Methods Mol Biol. 2025;2942:165-175. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4627-4_14.
4
Inferring Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Susceptibility From Ampicillin-Sulbactam Susceptibility Against Common Enterobacterales Species.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 May 14;12(6):ofaf295. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf295. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
Pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone-tazobactam (8:1) combination in healthy and induced diarrhoeic birds.
ADMET DMPK. 2022 Sep 13;10(3):180-196. doi: 10.5599/admet.1170. eCollection 2022.
10
A review on the mechanistic details of OXA enzymes of ESKAPE pathogens.
Pathog Glob Health. 2023 May;117(3):219-234. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2022.2088496. Epub 2022 Jun 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Kinetic interactions of tazobactam with beta-lactamases from all major structural classes.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Apr;37(4):851-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.4.851.
3
R-factor-mediated beta-lactamases that hydrolyze oxacillin: evidence for two distinct groups.
J Bacteriol. 1974 Aug;119(2):351-6. doi: 10.1128/jb.119.2.351-356.1974.
4
Molecular specificities of R factor-determined beta-lactamases: correlation with plasmid compatibility.
J Bacteriol. 1974 Jan;117(1):56-62. doi: 10.1128/jb.117.1.56-62.1974.
5
Five novel plasmid-determined beta-lactamases.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 May;27(5):715-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.27.5.715.
6
Contribution of beta-lactamases to bacterial resistance and mechanisms to inhibit beta-lactamases.
Am J Med. 1985 Nov 29;79(5B):2-12. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(85)90123-8.
7
Evolution of plasmid-coded resistance to broad-spectrum cephalosporins.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Aug;28(2):302-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.28.2.302.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验