• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检验干预机制理论的普遍性:理解青少年药物使用预防干预措施的效果。

Testing the generalizability of intervening mechanism theories: understanding the effects of adolescent drug use prevention interventions.

作者信息

Donaldson S I, Graham J W, Hansen W B

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Alhambra 91803.

出版信息

J Behav Med. 1994 Apr;17(2):195-216. doi: 10.1007/BF01858105.

DOI:10.1007/BF01858105
PMID:8035452
Abstract

Outcome research has shown that drug prevention programs based on theories of social influence often prevent the onset of adolescent drug use. However, little is known empirically about the processes through which they have their effects. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate intervening mechanism theories of two program models for preventing the onset of adolescent drug use. Analyses based on a total of 3077 fifth graders participating in the Adolescent Alcohol Prevention Trial revealed that both normative education and resistance training activated the causal processes they targeted. While beliefs about prevalence and acceptability significantly mediated the effects of normative education on subsequent adolescent drug use, resistance skills did not significantly predict subsequent drug use. More impressively, this pattern of results was virtually the same across sex, ethnicity, context (public versus private school students), drugs (alcohol, cigarettes, and marijuana) and levels of risk and was durable across time. These findings strongly suggest that successful social influence-based prevention programs may be driven primarily by their ability to foster social norms that reduce an adolescent's social motivation to begin using alcohol, cigarettes, and marijuana.

摘要

结果研究表明,基于社会影响理论的药物预防项目往往能预防青少年药物使用的开始。然而,从实证角度来看,对于它们产生效果的过程却知之甚少。本研究的目的是评估两种预防青少年药物使用开始的项目模型的干预机制理论。对总共3077名参与青少年酒精预防试验的五年级学生进行的分析表明,规范教育和抵抗训练都激活了它们所针对的因果过程。虽然关于流行程度和可接受性的信念显著介导了规范教育对随后青少年药物使用的影响,但抵抗技能并不能显著预测随后的药物使用。更令人印象深刻的是,这种结果模式在性别、种族、背景(公立学校学生与私立学校学生)、药物(酒精、香烟和大麻)以及风险水平方面几乎相同,并且随着时间的推移具有持续性。这些发现有力地表明,成功的基于社会影响的预防项目可能主要是由它们培养社会规范的能力驱动的,这些社会规范会降低青少年开始使用酒精、香烟和大麻的社会动机。

相似文献

1
Testing the generalizability of intervening mechanism theories: understanding the effects of adolescent drug use prevention interventions.检验干预机制理论的普遍性:理解青少年药物使用预防干预措施的效果。
J Behav Med. 1994 Apr;17(2):195-216. doi: 10.1007/BF01858105.
2
Changing adolescent propensities to use drugs: results from Project ALERT.改变青少年的吸毒倾向:“警示计划”的结果。
Health Educ Q. 1993 Summer;20(2):227-42. doi: 10.1177/109019819302000214.
3
Universal school-based substance abuse prevention programs: Modeling targeted mediators and outcomes for adolescent cigarette, alcohol and marijuana use.基于学校的普遍药物滥用预防项目:为青少年吸烟、饮酒和使用大麻建立目标调解因素及结果模型。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Jun 1;102(1-3):19-29. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.12.016. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
4
On becoming involved with drugs: modeling adolescent drug use over time.关于涉足毒品:对青少年长期吸毒情况进行建模
Health Psychol. 1992;11(6):377-85. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.11.6.377.
5
Risk factors for substance use among high school students: implications for prevention.高中生使用毒品的风险因素:对预防工作的启示
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1991 Jul;30(4):556-62. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199107000-00005.
6
[Drinking motivates, depending on the use of tobacco and cannabis among adolescents].[饮酒对青少年的影响取决于其烟草和大麻的使用情况]
Przegl Lek. 2014;71(11):592-6.
7
Long-term evaluation of drug abuse resistance education.药物滥用抵抗教育的长期评估。
Addict Behav. 1994 Mar-Apr;19(2):113-25. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(94)90036-1.
8
Drug prevention in a community setting: a longitudinal study of the relative effectiveness of a three-year primary prevention program in boys & girls clubs across the nation.社区环境中的药物预防:一项关于全国男孩女孩俱乐部为期三年的初级预防项目相对有效性的纵向研究。
Am J Community Psychol. 1992 Dec;20(6):673-706.
9
Effects of a community-based prevention program on decreasing drug use in high-risk adolescents.一项基于社区的预防项目对减少高危青少年药物使用的影响。
Am J Public Health. 1998 Jun;88(6):944-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.6.944.
10
Drug progression model: a social control test.药物进展模型:一项社会控制测试。
Int J Addict. 1995 Sep;30(11):1383-405. doi: 10.3109/10826089509055839.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the mechanisms of change in social norms around tobacco use: A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions.理解烟草使用社会规范的变化机制:干预措施的系统评价与荟萃分析
Addiction. 2025 Feb;120(2):215-235. doi: 10.1111/add.16685. Epub 2024 Oct 12.
2
Social networks and neural receptivity to persuasive health messages.社交网络与对说服性健康信息的神经接受度。
Health Psychol. 2021 Apr;40(4):285-294. doi: 10.1037/hea0001059.
3
The Effect of Social Norm-based Intervention with Observable Behaviour on Physical Activity among Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
School-based substance abuse prevention: a review of the state of the art in curriculum, 1980-1990.以学校为基础的药物滥用预防:1980 - 1990年课程发展现状综述
Health Educ Res. 1992 Sep;7(3):403-30. doi: 10.1093/her/7.3.403.
2
Multilevel models for hierarchically nested data: potential applications in substance abuse prevention research.用于分层嵌套数据的多层模型:在药物滥用预防研究中的潜在应用
NIDA Res Monogr. 1994;142:140-83.
3
Evaluating interventions with differential attrition: the importance of nonresponse mechanisms and use of follow-up data.
基于社会规范且伴有可观察行为的干预措施对青少年身体活动的影响:一项随机对照试验
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2020 Aug 31;12:52. doi: 10.1186/s13102-020-00202-y. eCollection 2020.
4
Cross-Sectional Study on Relationships Among FoMO, Social Influence, Positive Outcome Expectancy, Refusal Self-Efficacy and SNS Usage.横断面研究社交恐惧、社会影响、正向预期结果、拒绝效能感与社交媒体使用的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 14;17(16):5907. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165907.
5
Examining subgroup effects by socioeconomic status of public health interventions targeting multiple risk behaviour in adolescence.探讨针对青少年多种危险行为的公共卫生干预措施的社会经济地位亚组效应。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Oct 16;18(1):1180. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6042-0.
6
Using Attitudes, Age and Gender to Estimate an Adolescent's Substance Use Risk.利用态度、年龄和性别来评估青少年的物质使用风险。
J Child Serv. 2016;11(3):244-260. doi: 10.1108/JCS-06-2015-0020.
7
Universal school-based prevention for illicit drug use.针对非法药物使用的普及性校内预防措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(12):CD003020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003020.pub3. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
8
Effects of a school-based prevention programme on smoking in early adolescence: a 6-month follow-up of the 'Eigenstandig werden' cluster randomised trial.一项基于学校的预防计划对青少年早期吸烟的影响:“自主成长”整群随机试验的6个月随访
BMJ Open. 2014 Jan 21;4(1):e004422. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004422.
9
Did we get our money's worth? Bridging economic and behavioral measures of program success in adolescent drug prevention.我们的钱花得值吗?弥合青少年药物预防计划成功的经济和行为衡量标准。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Nov 8;10(11):5908-35. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10115908.
10
Computer-delivered social norm message increases pain tolerance.计算机传递的社会规范信息可提高疼痛耐受性。
Ann Behav Med. 2014 Jun;47(3):316-24. doi: 10.1007/s12160-013-9547-x.
评估存在差异损耗的干预措施:无应答机制的重要性及随访数据的使用
J Appl Psychol. 1993 Feb;78(1):119-28. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.119.
4
The smoking problem: a review of the research and theory in behavioral risk modification.吸烟问题:行为风险修正的研究与理论综述
Psychol Bull. 1980 Sep;88(2):370-405. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.88.2.370.
5
Epidemiological and psychosocial perspectives on adolescent drug use.青少年药物使用的流行病学和社会心理视角。
J Am Acad Child Psychiatry. 1982 Jul;21(4):328-47. doi: 10.1016/s0002-7138(09)60936-5.
6
Early predictors of age at first use of alcohol, marijuana, and cigarettes.首次使用酒精、大麻和香烟的年龄的早期预测因素。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1982 Aug;9(4):285-303. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(82)90068-0.
7
Measurement of adolescent smoking behavior: rationale and methods.青少年吸烟行为的测量:基本原理与方法。
J Behav Med. 1984 Mar;7(1):123-40. doi: 10.1007/BF00845351.
8
Reliability of self-report measures of drug use in prevention research: evaluation of the Project SMART questionnaire via the test-retest reliability matrix.预防研究中药物使用自我报告测量方法的可靠性:通过重测信度矩阵对SMART项目问卷进行评估。
J Drug Educ. 1984;14(2):175-93. doi: 10.2190/CYV0-7DPB-DJFA-EJ5U.
9
Preventing adolescent smoking: what have we learned about treatment construct validity?
Health Psychol. 1985;4(4):361-87. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.4.4.361.
10
Expired air carbon monoxide and saliva thiocyanate: relationships to self-reports of marijuana and cigarette smoking.呼出气体中的一氧化碳和唾液中的硫氰酸盐:与大麻和香烟吸食自我报告的关系。
Addict Behav. 1985;10(2):137-44. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(85)90019-x.