Suppr超能文献

用于识别高功能自闭症儿童的诊断工具之间的比较。

Comparison between diagnostic instruments for identifying high-functioning children with autism.

作者信息

Yirmiya N, Sigman M, Freeman B J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Israel.

出版信息

J Autism Dev Disord. 1994 Jun;24(3):281-91. doi: 10.1007/BF02172227.

Abstract

Two instruments for identifying autism in children and adolescents with intellectual abilities in the normal range were compared. Diagnostic tools consisted of the Autism Behavior Checklist (ABC) and the Autism Diagnostic Interview (ADI). The sample was composed of 18 children who were all diagnosed as having either infantile autism or infantile autism, residual state based on DSM-III criteria by a clinical team using observations, parental interviews, and interactions with the children. Only 4 of the children met diagnostic cutoffs for autism on the current ABC but all met criteria for diagnosis on the ABC using parental recall of the child's behavior at 3-5 years of age. The ADI had somewhat greater specificity in that 3 children did not meet criteria for diagnosis although 2 of these children also received ABC scores based on parental recollection that were in the borderline range.

摘要

对两种用于识别智力水平在正常范围的儿童和青少年自闭症的工具进行了比较。诊断工具包括自闭症行为量表(ABC)和自闭症诊断访谈(ADI)。样本由18名儿童组成,他们均被一个临床团队根据DSM-III标准,通过观察、家长访谈以及与儿童的互动诊断为患有婴儿自闭症或婴儿自闭症残留状态。在当前的ABC量表上,只有4名儿童达到自闭症诊断临界值,但如果使用家长回忆孩子3至5岁时的行为,所有儿童在ABC量表上均符合诊断标准。ADI的特异性稍高,有3名儿童不符合诊断标准,不过其中2名儿童根据家长回忆得出的ABC分数处于临界范围。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验