Suppr超能文献

用于识别高功能自闭症儿童的诊断工具之间的比较。

Comparison between diagnostic instruments for identifying high-functioning children with autism.

作者信息

Yirmiya N, Sigman M, Freeman B J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Israel.

出版信息

J Autism Dev Disord. 1994 Jun;24(3):281-91. doi: 10.1007/BF02172227.

Abstract

Two instruments for identifying autism in children and adolescents with intellectual abilities in the normal range were compared. Diagnostic tools consisted of the Autism Behavior Checklist (ABC) and the Autism Diagnostic Interview (ADI). The sample was composed of 18 children who were all diagnosed as having either infantile autism or infantile autism, residual state based on DSM-III criteria by a clinical team using observations, parental interviews, and interactions with the children. Only 4 of the children met diagnostic cutoffs for autism on the current ABC but all met criteria for diagnosis on the ABC using parental recall of the child's behavior at 3-5 years of age. The ADI had somewhat greater specificity in that 3 children did not meet criteria for diagnosis although 2 of these children also received ABC scores based on parental recollection that were in the borderline range.

摘要

对两种用于识别智力水平在正常范围的儿童和青少年自闭症的工具进行了比较。诊断工具包括自闭症行为量表(ABC)和自闭症诊断访谈(ADI)。样本由18名儿童组成,他们均被一个临床团队根据DSM-III标准,通过观察、家长访谈以及与儿童的互动诊断为患有婴儿自闭症或婴儿自闭症残留状态。在当前的ABC量表上,只有4名儿童达到自闭症诊断临界值,但如果使用家长回忆孩子3至5岁时的行为,所有儿童在ABC量表上均符合诊断标准。ADI的特异性稍高,有3名儿童不符合诊断标准,不过其中2名儿童根据家长回忆得出的ABC分数处于临界范围。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验