• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
State family planning and abortion expenditures: their effect on public health.国家计划生育和堕胎支出:它们对公共卫生的影响。
Am J Public Health. 1994 Sep;84(9):1468-72. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.9.1468.
2
Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures.公共资助的避孕服务对意外怀孕的影响及其对医疗补助支出的意义。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Sep-Oct;28(5):188-95.
3
Public funding for contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1994.1994年避孕药具、绝育及堕胎服务的公共资金
Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Jul-Aug;28(4):166-73.
4
The costs and benefits of government expenditures for family planning programs.政府计划生育项目支出的成本与效益。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1981 May-Jun;13(3):117-8, 120-4.
5
Family planning issues relating to maternal and infant mortality in the United States.美国与母婴死亡率相关的计划生育问题。
Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1993;27(2):120-34.
6
Return on investment: a fuller assessment of the benefits and cost savings of the US publicly funded family planning program.投资回报率:对美国公共资助计划生育项目的效益和成本节约情况进行更全面的评估。
Milbank Q. 2014 Dec;92(4):696-749. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12080. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
7
Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1982.1982年避孕药具、绝育及堕胎服务的公共资金投入
Fam Plann Perspect. 1984 May-Jun;16(3):128-33.
8
The impact of public-sector expenditures for contraceptive services in California.加利福尼亚州公共部门在避孕服务方面的支出影响。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1990 Jul-Aug;22(4):161-8.
9
Counseling and referrals for women with unplanned pregnancies at publicly funded family planning organizations in Texas.德克萨斯州公共资助计划生育组织中意外怀孕女性的咨询和转介。
Contraception. 2019 Jan;99(1):48-51. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
10
The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.州政府对堕胎的限制所产生的经济影响:父母同意和通知法以及医疗补助资金限制。
J Policy Anal Manage. 1993 Summer;12(3):498-511.

引用本文的文献

1
Lifetime abortion incidence when abortion care is covered by Medicaid: Maryland versus five comparison states.当医疗补助计划涵盖堕胎护理时的终身堕胎发生率:马里兰州与五个对比州。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct;59(5):e14358. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14358. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
2
Structural Heteropatriarchy and Birth Outcomes in the United States.美国的结构性异性家长制与生育结果
Demography. 2022 Feb 1;59(1):89-110. doi: 10.1215/00703370-9606030.
3
The macroeconomics of abortion: A scoping review and analysis of the costs and outcomes.堕胎的宏观经济学:成本与结果的范围界定综述和分析。
PLoS One. 2021 May 6;16(5):e0250692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250692. eCollection 2021.
4
Shining the light on abortion: Drivers of online abortion searches across the United States in 2018.揭示堕胎现象:2018 年美国各地在线堕胎搜索的驱动因素。
PLoS One. 2020 May 21;15(5):e0231672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231672. eCollection 2020.
5
Reproductive justice & preventable deaths: state funding, family planning, abortion, and infant mortality, US 1980-2010.生殖正义与可预防的死亡:1980 - 2010年美国的国家资金、计划生育、堕胎与婴儿死亡率
SSM Popul Health. 2016 Dec;2:277-293. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.03.007.
6
Public finance policy strategies to increase access to preconception care.增加孕前保健可及性的公共财政政策策略。
Matern Child Health J. 2006 Sep;10(5 Suppl):S85-91. doi: 10.1007/s10995-006-0125-8.
7
The impact of state-level restrictions on abortion.州级堕胎限制的影响。
Demography. 1996 Aug;33(3):307-12.
8
More evidence for the public health value of family planning.计划生育对公共卫生价值的更多证据。
Am J Public Health. 1994 Sep;84(9):1377-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.9.1377.
9
Justice Blackmun and legal abortion--a besieged legacy to women's reproductive health.布莱克门大法官与合法堕胎——女性生殖健康的一项备受围攻的遗产。
Am J Public Health. 1995 Sep;85(9):1204-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.9.1204.
10
Abortions in rural Idaho: physicians' attitudes and practices.爱达荷州农村地区的堕胎情况:医生的态度与做法。
Am J Public Health. 1995 Oct;85(10):1423-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.10.1423.

本文引用的文献

1
The politics of funding abortion: state responses to the political environment.堕胎资金的政治问题:各州对政治环境的应对措施。
Am Polit Q. 1993 Jan;21(1):81-101. doi: 10.1177/1532673x9302100106.
2
An economic analysis of the demand for abortions.堕胎需求的经济分析。
Econ Inq. 1988 Apr;26(2):353-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1988.tb01499.x.
3
Determinants of neonatal mortality rates in the U.S. A reduced form model.美国新生儿死亡率的决定因素。一种简约形式模型。
J Health Econ. 1985 Sep;4(3):213-36. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(85)90030-x.
4
Family planning agencies: services, policies and funding.计划生育机构:服务、政策与资金
Fam Plann Perspect. 1994 Mar-Apr;26(2):52-9, 82.
5
Variations in infant mortality rates among counties of the United States: the roles of public policies and programs.美国各县婴儿死亡率的差异:公共政策与项目的作用。
Demography. 1981 Nov;18(4):695-713.
6
Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1983.1983年避孕药具、绝育和堕胎服务的公共资金
Fam Plann Perspect. 1985 Jan-Feb;17(1):25-30.
7
The need for prenatal care in the United States: evidence from the 1980 National Natality Survey.美国产前护理的必要性:来自1980年全国出生情况调查的证据。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1985 May-Jun;17(3):118-24.
8
Can low birth weight be prevented?低出生体重可以预防吗?
Fam Plann Perspect. 1985 May-Jun;17(3):112-8.
9
Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1985.1985年避孕药具、绝育和堕胎服务的公共资金投入
Fam Plann Perspect. 1986 Nov-Dec;18(6):259-64.
10
Pregnancy wantedness and maternal behavior during pregnancy.孕期对怀孕的意愿及母亲行为
Demography. 1987 Aug;24(3):407-12.

国家计划生育和堕胎支出:它们对公共卫生的影响。

State family planning and abortion expenditures: their effect on public health.

作者信息

Meier K J, McFarlane D R

机构信息

Department of Political Science, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee 53201.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 1994 Sep;84(9):1468-72. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.9.1468.

DOI:10.2105/ajph.84.9.1468
PMID:8092373
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1615165/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study examines whether state family planning expenditures and abortion funding for Medicaid-eligible women might reduce the number of low-birthweight babies, babies with late or no prenatal care, and premature births, as well as the rates of infant and neonatal mortality.

METHODS

Using a pooled time-series analysis from 1982 to 1988 with the 50 states as units of analysis, this study assessed the impact of family planning expenditures and abortion funding on several public health outcomes while controlling for other important variables and statistical problems inherent in pooled time-series studies.

RESULTS

States that funded abortions had a significantly higher rate of abortions and significantly lower rates of teen pregnancy, low-birthweight babies, premature births, and births with late or no prenatal care. States that had higher expenditures for family planning had significantly fewer abortions, low-birthweight babies, births with late or no prenatal care, infant deaths, and neonatal deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Funding abortions for Medicaid-eligible women and increasing the level of expenditures for family planning are associated with major differences in infant and maternal health in the United States.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨针对符合医疗补助条件的女性的州计划生育支出和堕胎资金,是否可能减少低体重儿、未接受或较晚接受产前护理的婴儿以及早产的数量,以及婴儿和新生儿死亡率。

方法

本研究采用1982年至1988年的合并时间序列分析,以50个州作为分析单位,在控制其他重要变量以及合并时间序列研究中固有的统计问题的同时,评估计划生育支出和堕胎资金对若干公共卫生结果的影响。

结果

为堕胎提供资金的州,堕胎率显著更高,而青少年怀孕率、低体重儿出生率、早产率以及未接受或较晚接受产前护理的出生率则显著更低。计划生育支出较高的州,堕胎、低体重儿、未接受或较晚接受产前护理的出生、婴儿死亡和新生儿死亡的情况显著较少。

结论

为符合医疗补助条件的女性提供堕胎资金以及增加计划生育支出水平,与美国婴儿和孕产妇健康方面的重大差异相关。