Suppr超能文献

两种缝合材料(Dexon Plus和Maxon)在腹式子宫切除术中的比较。

Comparison of two suture materials, Dexon Plus and Maxon, in abdominal hysterectomy.

作者信息

Kiilholma P, Mäkinen J, Tenho T, Pitkänen Y, Hirvonen T

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Turku University Central Hospital, Finland.

出版信息

Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl. 1994;208:47-9.

PMID:8092771
Abstract

The performance and handling capacities of two synthetic absorbable sutures, the monofilament suture Maxon and the multifilament suture Dexon Plus, were compared to study if these sutures are acceptable as all-purpose suture materials in abdominal hysterectomy. Four senior gynecological surgeons performed altogether 102 hysterectomies and made an assessment of handling qualities. Fifty one patients were sutured with Maxon and 51 age-matched controls with Dexon Plus. Maxon proved to be superior to Dexon Plus in terms of knot rundown, tissue drag and knot repositioning whereas, in terms of suppleness, tensile strength and knot security both suture materials were comparable. Vaginal granulation was seen in five patients operated on with Dexon Plus and only in one patient in the Maxon group. According to this study Maxon is as safe and efficacious as Dexon Plus for abdominal hysterectomy and its handling properties were even better than those of Dexon Plus.

摘要

比较了两种合成可吸收缝线(单丝缝线Maxon和多丝缝线Dexon Plus)的性能和操作能力,以研究这些缝线是否适合作为腹部子宫切除术的通用缝合材料。四位资深妇科外科医生共进行了102例子宫切除术,并对操作质量进行了评估。51例患者用Maxon缝合,51例年龄匹配的对照组用Dexon Plus缝合。在打结速度、组织牵拉和结的重新定位方面,Maxon被证明优于Dexon Plus;而在柔韧性、拉伸强度和结的安全性方面,两种缝合材料相当。使用Dexon Plus手术的5例患者出现了阴道肉芽组织,而Maxon组仅1例。根据这项研究,Maxon在腹部子宫切除术中与Dexon Plus一样安全有效,其操作性能甚至优于Dexon Plus。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验