Triedman J K, Saul J P
Department of Cardiology, Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115.
J Clin Monit. 1994 Jan;10(1):11-20. doi: 10.1007/BF01651461.
The purpose of this study was to estimate the accuracy, bias, and frequency response of continuous blood pressure monitoring using finger photoplethysmography in children.
To compare arterial blood pressure measured using the Finapres device with simultaneously measured intraarterial blood pressure we studied 27 randomly selected postoperative pediatric patients who were receiving a variety of inotropic and vasoactive agents at a cardiac intensive care unit in university-affiliated pediatric hospital.
Sixty-two of 66 attempts (94%) to obtain a noninvasive blood pressure measurement were successful. A total of 37,351 paired blood pressure measurements from 53 records were compared, revealing a measurement bias of -18.6 mm Hg for systolic blood pressure and -13.4 mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure. The measurement bias increased proportionately to blood pressure, with systolic and diastolic gains between the noninvasive and intraarterial techniques of 0.86 and 0.75 mm Hg/mm Hg, respectively. The variation bias during each recording epoch, as measured by standard deviation of bias, was low (mean sigma systolic = 2.9 mm Hg; mean sigma diastolic = 2.0 mm Hg). The frequency response between the intraarterial and noninvasive pressure waveforms was flat to 10 Hz and approximately equal to 1.
Substantial measurement bias exits between this noninvasive blood pressure measurement technique and intraarterial blood pressure. Measurements of the intrapatient variability and frequency response analysis suggest that the noninvasive technique accurately tracks intraarterial blood pressure over the short term. This technique may have useful applications in settings where intraarterial monitoring is undersirable or unobtainable.
本研究旨在评估采用手指光电容积脉搏波描记法进行儿童连续血压监测的准确性、偏差和频率响应。
为了将使用Finapres设备测量的动脉血压与同时测量的动脉内血压进行比较,我们研究了27例随机选择的术后儿科患者,这些患者在大学附属医院的心脏重症监护病房接受各种强心剂和血管活性药物治疗。
66次获取无创血压测量的尝试中有62次(94%)成功。比较了来自53份记录的总共37351对血压测量值,结果显示收缩压测量偏差为-18.6 mmHg,舒张压测量偏差为-13.4 mmHg。测量偏差与血压成比例增加,无创技术与动脉内技术之间收缩压和舒张压的增益分别为0.86 mmHg/mmHg和0.75 mmHg/mmHg。通过偏差标准差测量的每个记录时段的变异偏差较低(平均收缩压标准差=2.9 mmHg;平均舒张压标准差=2.0 mmHg)。动脉内和无创压力波形之间的频率响应在10 Hz以内是平坦的,且近似等于1。
这种无创血压测量技术与动脉内血压之间存在显著的测量偏差。患者内变异性测量和频率响应分析表明,该无创技术在短期内能准确跟踪动脉内血压。在动脉内监测不可行或无法实现的情况下,该技术可能具有有用的应用价值。