Shinozaki T, Deane R S, Mazuzan J E
Anesthesiology. 1980 Dec;53(6):498-504. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198012000-00011.
Direct measurement of blood pressure with a fluid-filled catheter and transducer is widely accepted in clinical practice. However, errors associated with the measurements are often not appreciated. The system frequently is unable to reproduce rapidly changing waveforms and overshoots to produce higher peak pressures. The most common causes of this phenomenon are trapped small air bubbles and long connecting tubing. To assess the inaccuracy in pressure measurements, we calculated the weighted sum of the percentage difference between reference and recorded amplitudes of sinusoidal waveforms for several catheters and connecting tubings. We found that when the connecting tubing was shorter than 3 feet long and no air bubbles were trapped readings were accurate. On the contrary, connecting tubings 7 feet long or longer, and/or air bubbles, were frequently associated with inaccurate results. For example, minimal air bubbles (0.25 ml) in a system exaggerated the systolic pressure measurement by 41 torr when simulated blood pressure was 150/50 torr.
在临床实践中,使用充满液体的导管和换能器直接测量血压已被广泛接受。然而,与测量相关的误差往往未被重视。该系统常常无法重现快速变化的波形,并且会出现过冲现象,从而产生更高的峰值压力。这种现象最常见的原因是存在被困的小气泡和较长的连接管。为了评估压力测量中的不准确性,我们计算了几种导管和连接管的参考振幅与记录振幅之间百分比差异的加权和。我们发现,当连接管短于3英尺且没有被困气泡时,读数是准确的。相反,7英尺或更长的连接管和/或气泡常常会导致结果不准确。例如,当模拟血压为150/50托时,系统中最小量的气泡(0.25毫升)会使收缩压测量值夸大41托。