Woodcock C L
Biology Department, University of Massachusetts, Amherst 01003.
J Cell Biol. 1994 Apr;125(1):11-9. doi: 10.1083/jcb.125.1.11.
Chromatin fibers have been observed and measured in frozen hydrated sections of three types of cell (chicken erythrocytes and sperm of Patiria miniata and Thyone briareus) representing an approximately 20-bp range of nucleosomal repeat lengths. For sperm of the starfish P. miniata, it was possible to obtain images of chromatin fibers from cells that were swimming in seawater up to the moment of cryo-immobilization, thus providing a record of the native morphology of the chromatin of these cells. Glutaraldehyde fixation produced no significant changes in the ultrastructure or diameter of chromatin fibers, and fiber diameters observed in cryosections were similar to those recorded after low temperature embedding in Lowicryl K11M. Chromatin fiber diameters measured from cryosections of the three types of nuclei were similar, a striking contrast to the situation for chromatin isolated from these cell types, where a strong positive correlation between diameter and nucleosomal repeat length has been established. The demonstration of chromatin fibers in unfixed whole cells establishes an unequivocal baseline for the study of native chromatin and chromosome architecture. The significant differences between chromatin fibers in nucleo and after isolation supports a previous observation (P. J. Giannasca, R. A. Horowitz, and C. L. Woodcock. 1993. J. Cell Sci. 105:551-561), and suggests that structural studies on isolated material should be interpreted with caution until the changes that accompany chromatin isolation are understood.
在三种类型细胞(鸡红细胞、微小海盘车精子和加州双盘吸虫精子)的冷冻水合切片中观察并测量了染色质纤维,这三种细胞的核小体重复长度范围约为20个碱基对。对于海星微小海盘车的精子,有可能获得从在海水中游动直至冷冻固定那一刻的细胞中染色质纤维的图像,从而提供这些细胞染色质天然形态的记录。戊二醛固定对染色质纤维的超微结构或直径没有产生显著变化,并且在冷冻切片中观察到的纤维直径与在低温包埋于Lowicryl K11M后记录的直径相似。从这三种类型细胞核的冷冻切片中测量的染色质纤维直径相似,这与从这些细胞类型中分离出的染色质的情况形成了鲜明对比,在后者中已确定直径与核小体重复长度之间存在强正相关。在未固定的完整细胞中对染色质纤维的证明为天然染色质和染色体结构的研究确立了明确的基线。细胞核内染色质纤维与分离后染色质纤维之间的显著差异支持了先前的一项观察结果(P. J. 贾纳斯卡、R. A. 霍洛维茨和C. L. 伍德科克。1993年。《细胞科学杂志》105:551 - 561),并表明在理解染色质分离所伴随的变化之前,对分离材料的结构研究应谨慎解释。