• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Assessment of DSM-III personality structure in a general-population survey.

作者信息

Nestadt G, Eaton W W, Romanoski A J, Garrison R, Folstein M F, McHugh P R

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Compr Psychiatry. 1994 Jan-Feb;35(1):54-63. doi: 10.1016/0010-440x(94)90170-8.

DOI:10.1016/0010-440x(94)90170-8
PMID:8149730
Abstract

The object of this study is to assess the internal validity of DSM-III personality constructs and to explore whether the constituent elements are better explained by an alternate internally coherent classification. A two-stage stratified random sample of subjects identified at the Baltimore site of the Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) program were examined by psychiatrists for DSM-III personality attributes using a semistructured instrument. Dichotomous factor analysis was used in the confirmatory mode to test whether a single factor explained each of the 11 DSM-III personality disorders. This approach rejected a single explanatory factor for all but compulsive personality disorder. Exploratory factor analysis showed that these DSM-III personality features are parsimoniously described by a five-factor model. These factors are warmth, animation, timidity, trust, and scrupulousness.

摘要

相似文献

1
Assessment of DSM-III personality structure in a general-population survey.
Compr Psychiatry. 1994 Jan-Feb;35(1):54-63. doi: 10.1016/0010-440x(94)90170-8.
2
DSM-III-R personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality: an empirical comparison.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)中的人格障碍与人格五因素模型:一项实证比较
J Abnorm Psychol. 1992 Aug;101(3):553-60. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.101.3.553.
3
The relationship between personality and DSM-III axis I disorders in the population: results from an epidemiological survey.普通人群中人格与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版轴I障碍之间的关系:一项流行病学调查结果
Am J Psychiatry. 1992 Sep;149(9):1228-33. doi: 10.1176/ajp.149.9.1228.
4
Comparison of a diagnostic checklist with a structured interview for the assessment of DSM-III-R and ICD-10 personality disorders.用于评估《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)和《国际疾病分类》第十版(ICD-10)人格障碍的诊断清单与结构化访谈的比较。
Psychopathology. 1994;27(6):312-20. doi: 10.1159/000284889.
5
A comparison of DSM-III-R and ICD-10 personality disorder criteria in an out-patient population.门诊人群中《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)与《国际疾病分类》第十版(ICD-10)人格障碍标准的比较。
Psychol Med. 1996 Jan;26(1):151-60. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700033791.
6
An evaluation of DSM-III-R personality disorders.对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订版中人格障碍的评估。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1991 Dec;84(6):512-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1991.tb03186.x.
7
The relationship between DSM-III personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality.
Compr Psychiatry. 1993 Jul-Aug;34(4):227-34. doi: 10.1016/0010-440x(93)90003-m.
8
A behavior analytic conceptualization of personality disorders: a response to Clark, Livesley, and Morey.人格障碍的行为分析概念化:对克拉克、利夫斯利和莫雷的回应。
J Pers Disord. 1997 Fall;11(3):232-41. doi: 10.1521/pedi.1997.11.3.232.
9
DSM-III compulsive personality disorder: an epidemiological survey.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版强迫型人格障碍:一项流行病学调查
Psychol Med. 1991 May;21(2):461-71. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700020572.
10
Development and validation of a computerized screening test for personality disorders in DSM-III-R.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1997 Apr;95(4):351-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb09643.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Symptom-level analysis of DSM-IV/DSM-5 personality pathology in later life: Hierarchical structure and predictive validity across self- and informant ratings.晚年 DSM-IV/DSM-5 人格病理学的症状水平分析:自我和知情者评定的层次结构和预测效度。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2019 Jul;128(5):365-384. doi: 10.1037/abn0000444.
2
Ten-year stability and latent structure of the DSM-IV schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版中分裂型、边缘型、回避型及强迫型人格障碍的十年稳定性及潜在结构
J Abnorm Psychol. 2009 Aug;118(3):507-19. doi: 10.1037/a0016478.
3
Multifinality in the development of personality disorders: a Biology x Sex x Environment interaction model of antisocial and borderline traits.
人格障碍发展中的多终性:反社会和边缘性特质的生物学×性别×环境交互作用模型。
Dev Psychopathol. 2009 Summer;21(3):735-70. doi: 10.1017/S0954579409000418.
4
Personality disorder traits as predictors of subsequent first-onset panic disorder or agoraphobia.人格障碍特质作为后续首次发作惊恐障碍或广场恐惧症的预测因素。
Compr Psychiatry. 2009 May-Jun;50(3):209-14. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2008.08.006. Epub 2008 Oct 21.
5
The structure of genetic and environmental risk factors for DSM-IV personality disorders: a multivariate twin study.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版人格障碍的遗传和环境风险因素结构:一项多变量双胞胎研究
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;65(12):1438-46. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.65.12.1438.
6
The relationship between the five-factor model and latent Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition personality disorder dimensions.五因素模型与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册(第四版)》潜在人格障碍维度之间的关系。
Compr Psychiatry. 2008 Jan-Feb;49(1):98-105. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2007.05.015. Epub 2007 Oct 23.
7
Schizophrenia, psychiatric genetics, and Darwinian psychiatry: an evolutionary framework.精神分裂症、精神科遗传学与达尔文式精神病学:一个进化框架
Schizophr Bull. 2008 Jul;34(4):722-33. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbm130. Epub 2007 Nov 21.
8
The factor structure of the DSM-III-R personality disorders: an evaluation of competing models.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)中人格障碍的因素结构:对竞争模型的评估
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2005;14(1):43-55. doi: 10.1002/mpr.16.
9
Factorial structure of pathological personality as evaluated by peers.由同伴评估的病理性人格的因子结构。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2003 Feb;112(1):81-91.