Bollendorf A, Check J H, Katsoff D, Lurie D
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School at Camden.
Arch Androl. 1994 Mar-Apr;32(2):157-62. doi: 10.3109/01485019408987781.
A comparison was made of three sperm separation techniques--direct swim-up, mini-Percoll, and Sephadex G-10--on semen parameters, including count, % motility, forward progression, and hypoosmotic swelling (HOS) test scores. Overall, the best quality sperm (less debris, best % and quality motility, and best HOS scores) were noted with the direct swim-up procedure. Mini-Percoll resulted in the highest count, but the worst HOS score. Sephadex G-10 resulted in quality of semen specimen almost as good as the direct swim-up procedure, but did allow some noncellular debris and bacteria to filter through the column.
对三种精子分离技术——直接上游法、微型Percoll法和葡聚糖凝胶G - 10法——在精液参数方面进行了比较,这些参数包括计数、活动率百分比、前向运动能力以及低渗肿胀(HOS)试验评分。总体而言,直接上游法获得的精子质量最佳(碎片较少、活动率百分比和质量最佳、HOS评分最佳)。微型Percoll法得到的精子计数最高,但HOS评分最差。葡聚糖凝胶G - 10法得到的精液标本质量几乎与直接上游法一样好,但确实会使一些非细胞碎片和细菌通过柱体。