• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理学与筛查:缩小疗效与效果之间的差距。

Psychology and screening: narrowing the gap between efficacy and effectiveness.

作者信息

Marteau T M

机构信息

Psychology and Genetics Research Group, United Medical School of Guy's, London, UK.

出版信息

Br J Clin Psychol. 1994 Feb;33(1):1-10. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1994.tb01089.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1994.tb01089.x
PMID:8173536
Abstract

The success of any health-related screening programme depends primarily upon behavioural factors, namely whether people attend, and for those who do attend, the cognitive, emotional and behavioural consequences of doing so. Some of the problems now evident in screening programmes, such as low attendance or high levels of anxiety following participation are due in part to an under-investigation of the psychological processes and outcomes critical to achieving the goals of screening programmes. These goals include high rates of informed participation and satisfactory psychological outcomes of such participation. The development of psychological models in this area may help in documenting the factors mediating and moderating responses to screening, and may suggest interventions likely to facilitate the achievement of the goals of a screening programme.

摘要

任何与健康相关的筛查项目的成功主要取决于行为因素,即人们是否参加筛查,以及对于那些参加筛查的人来说,参加筛查所带来的认知、情感和行为后果。目前在筛查项目中明显存在的一些问题,比如低参与率或参与后高度焦虑,部分原因在于对实现筛查项目目标至关重要的心理过程和结果的研究不足。这些目标包括高比例的知情参与以及这种参与带来的令人满意的心理结果。该领域心理模型的发展可能有助于记录介导和调节对筛查反应的因素,并可能提出有助于实现筛查项目目标的干预措施。

相似文献

1
Psychology and screening: narrowing the gap between efficacy and effectiveness.心理学与筛查:缩小疗效与效果之间的差距。
Br J Clin Psychol. 1994 Feb;33(1):1-10. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1994.tb01089.x.
2
Concerns, perceived need and competing priorities: a qualitative exploration of decision-making and non-participation in a population-based flexible sigmoidoscopy screening programme to prevent colorectal cancer.担忧、感知到的需求及相互竞争的优先事项:对一项基于人群的预防结直肠癌的柔性乙状结肠镜筛查计划中的决策制定和不参与情况的定性探索。
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 11;6(11):e012304. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012304.
3
Can Flemish women in semi-rural areas be motivated to attend organized breast cancer screening?半农村地区的佛兰芒女性会被激励去参加有组织的乳腺癌筛查吗?
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1999 Apr;47(2):119-27.
4
Socio-psychological factors in the Expanded Health Belief Model and subsequent colorectal cancer screening.扩展健康信念模型中的社会心理因素与后续的结直肠癌筛查
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jul;98(7):901-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.03.023. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
5
[Women's social conditions and their participation in Cervical Cancer Population Screening Program in Poland].[波兰女性的社会状况及其参与宫颈癌人群筛查项目的情况]
Ginekol Pol. 2009 Nov;80(11):833-8.
6
Informed choice to undergo prenatal screening: a comparison of two hospitals conducting testing either as part of a routine visit or requiring a separate visit.接受产前筛查的知情选择:两家医院的比较,一家将检测作为常规就诊的一部分,另一家则要求单独就诊。
J Med Screen. 2002;9(3):109-14. doi: 10.1136/jms.9.3.109.
7
How can the uptake of cervical cytology screening be improved?如何提高子宫颈细胞学筛查的接受率?
Nurs Stand. 2001;16(11):33-6. doi: 10.7748/ns2001.11.16.11.33.c3124.
8
[Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].[2007 - 2009年波兰宫颈癌筛查项目的参与率]
Ginekol Pol. 2010 Sep;81(9):655-63.
9
System-level and patient-level explanations for non-attendance at diabetic retinopathy screening in Sutton and Merton (London, UK): a qualitative analysis of a service evaluation.英国伦敦萨顿和默顿地区糖尿病视网膜病变筛查未就诊情况的系统层面及患者层面解释:一项服务评估的定性分析
BMJ Open. 2016 May 18;6(5):e010952. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010952.
10
Prospective study of predictors of attendance for breast screening in inner London.伦敦市中心区乳腺癌筛查就诊预测因素的前瞻性研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994 Feb;48(1):65-73. doi: 10.1136/jech.48.1.65.

引用本文的文献

1
Communicating benign biopsy results by telephone in the NHS Breast Screening Programme: a protocol for a cluster randomised crossover trial.通过电话向国民保健制度乳房筛查计划中的良性活检结果进行沟通:一项集群随机交叉试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 2;9(8):e028679. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028679.
2
Communication of cancer screening results by letter, telephone or in person: A mixed methods systematic review of the effect on attendee anxiety, understanding and preferences.通过信件、电话或亲自沟通癌症筛查结果:对参与者焦虑、理解和偏好影响的混合方法系统评价
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Dec 29;13:189-195. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.12.016. eCollection 2019 Mar.
3
Cytological surveillance compared with immediate referral for colposcopy in management of women with low grade cervical abnormalities: multicentre randomised controlled trial.
细胞学监测与直接转诊阴道镜检查在低级别宫颈异常女性管理中的比较:多中心随机对照试验
BMJ. 2009 Jul 28;339:b2546. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2546.
4
The ethics of type 1 diabetes prediction and prevention research.1型糖尿病预测与预防研究的伦理学
Theor Med Bioeth. 2003;24(2):177-97. doi: 10.1023/a:1024686511111.
5
Community development in the new NHS.新国民保健制度中的社区发展
Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Jun;49(443):428-9.
6
Screening for genital chlamydial infection: the agenda for general practice.生殖器衣原体感染筛查:全科医疗议程
Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Jun;49(443):427-8.
7
Screening in primary care: pointers for further research.基层医疗中的筛查:进一步研究的要点
Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Oct;46(411):567-8.