Croft P R, Rigby A S
Arthritis and Rheumatism Council Epidemiology Research Unit, University of Manchester.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994 Apr;48(2):166-70. doi: 10.1136/jech.48.2.166.
To determine the association between measures of socioeconomic status and reported back pain in a national sample survey of the adult population of Britain.
Secondary analysis of a cross sectional interview survey (the Health and Lifestyle Survey).
Households in England, Wales, and Scotland.
Those 9003 adults aged 18 years and above who agreed to an interview, from a study base of 12,254 private households that had been identified in a three stage sampling procedure based on electoral registers. Subjects who reported back pain in the month before interview were compared with all those who stated they had not experienced this symptom.
Women whose households were in the lowest income category were more likely to report back pain than those in the highest income group (odds ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2, 2.1). In addition, women with no formal educational qualification were more likely to report back pain than women who had a qualification (odds ratio 1.5, 95% CI 1.0, 2.1). These associations were not explained by smoking, obesity, and coexistent depressive symptoms. In men the only socioeconomic link with back pain seemed to be manual occupation.
These findings confirm the higher burden of back pain in the socially disadvantaged, but suggest that this cannot yet be explained by known risk factors for back trouble.
在一项针对英国成年人口的全国性抽样调查中,确定社会经济地位指标与报告的背痛之间的关联。
对一项横断面访谈调查(健康与生活方式调查)进行二次分析。
英格兰、威尔士和苏格兰的家庭。
在基于选民登记册的三阶段抽样程序中确定的12254个私人家庭的研究样本中,9003名18岁及以上同意接受访谈的成年人。将在访谈前一个月报告有背痛的研究对象与所有表示未经历过这种症状的研究对象进行比较。
家庭收入处于最低类别组的女性比收入最高组的女性更有可能报告背痛(优势比1.6,95%置信区间[CI]1.2,2.1)。此外,未接受过正规教育的女性比有学历的女性更有可能报告背痛(优势比1.5,95%CI1.0,2.1)。这些关联无法用吸烟、肥胖和并存的抑郁症状来解释。在男性中,与背痛唯一的社会经济联系似乎是体力劳动职业。
这些研究结果证实了社会弱势群体中背痛负担较重,但表明这一点目前尚无法用已知的背部问题风险因素来解释。