Merepeza Alban
Port Hope Health Centre, 181 Toronto Rd. Unit 6, Port Hope ON, L1A 3V5,
J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2014 Dec;58(4):456-66.
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a prevalent disorder that has a significant burden to society in terms of loss of work time and increased economic cost. Two common treatment choices of intervention for CLBP are spinal manipulation and prescribed exercise.
The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the effectiveness of spinal manipulation vs prescribed exercise for patients diagnosed with CLBP. Studies that compared head-to-head spinal manipulation to an exercise group were included in this review.
A search of the current literature was conducted using a keyword process in CINAHL, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials Database, Medline, and Embase. The search was conducted on, and included studies available up to August 29(th) 2014. Studies were included based on PICOS criteria 1) individuals with CLBP defined as lasting 12 weeks or longer; 2) spinal manipulation performed by a health care practitioner; 3) prescribed exercise for the treatment of CLBP and monitored by a health care practitioner; 4) measurable clinical outcomes for reducing pain, disability or improving function; 5) randomized controlled trials. The quality of included articles was determined by the author using the criteria developed and used by the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro).
Three randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria of this systematic review and were included in this review. The outcomes used in these studies included Disability Indexes, Pain Scales and function improvement scales. The results included a mix of effects with one study finding spinal manipulation as more effective and another finding the exercises more so. The third study found both interventions offering equal effects in the long term.
Based on the findings of this systematic review there is no conclusive evidence that clearly favours spinal manipulation or exercise as more effective in treatment of CLBP. More studies are needed to further explore which intervention is more effective.
慢性下腰痛(CLBP)是一种常见疾病,在工作时间损失和经济成本增加方面给社会带来了重大负担。CLBP的两种常见干预治疗选择是脊柱推拿和规定的运动疗法。
本系统评价的目的是研究脊柱推拿与规定的运动疗法对诊断为CLBP的患者的有效性。本评价纳入了将脊柱推拿与运动组进行直接比较的研究。
使用CINAHL、Cochrane对照试验注册数据库、Medline和Embase中的关键词检索当前文献。检索截至2014年8月29日可用的研究。根据PICOS标准纳入研究:1)CLBP定义为持续12周或更长时间的个体;2)由医疗保健从业者进行脊柱推拿;3)用于治疗CLBP并由医疗保健从业者监测的规定运动疗法;4)用于减轻疼痛、残疾或改善功能的可测量临床结果;5)随机对照试验。纳入文章的质量由作者使用物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)制定和使用的标准确定。
三项随机对照试验符合本系统评价的纳入标准并被纳入本评价。这些研究中使用的结果包括残疾指数、疼痛量表和功能改善量表。结果呈现出多种效应,一项研究发现脊柱推拿更有效,另一项研究发现运动疗法更有效。第三项研究发现两种干预措施在长期效果上相当。
基于本系统评价的结果,没有确凿证据表明脊柱推拿或运动疗法在治疗CLBP方面更有效。需要更多研究来进一步探索哪种干预措施更有效。