Suppr超能文献

荷兰养老院中的自愿主动安乐死和医生协助自杀:审慎操作的要求是否得到妥善满足?

Voluntary active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in Dutch nursing homes: are the requirements for prudent practice properly met?

作者信息

Muller M T, Van der Wal G, van Eijk J T, Ribbe M W

机构信息

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of General Practice and Nursing Home Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994 Jun;42(6):624-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb06861.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To acquire data about and an understanding of the way in which Dutch nursing home physicians (NHPs) who administer voluntary active euthanasia and/or physician-assisted suicide (EAS) cope with the requirements for prudent practice. These requirements include: the patient must experience his or her suffering as unbearable and hopeless; the wish to die must be well considered and persistent; the request must be voluntary; the NHP must consult at least one other physician; the physician is not allowed to issue a certificate testifying to natural death and is obliged to keep records.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, MEASUREMENTS: See preceding paper.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine NHPs (12%) indicated that they had administered EAS on at least one occasion. The state of the patient was described by the NHP as utterly hopeless in 88% of cases and as utterly unbearable in 64% of the cases. The period of time between the first discussion of the subject and the actual administration varied from less than a day to more than a year. The most frequently given reasons for the request were unbearable suffering (53%) and hopeless suffering (49%). The majority of the NHPs (85%) indicated that it was the patient who first broached the subject of EAS. Eighty-five percent of the NHPs also requested a consultation with another physician. In the majority of cases this second opinion was given by another NHP (63%); over 50% of these NHPs worked in the same nursing home. Ninety-one percent of the physicians consulted were convinced that the request was well considered, and 93% found that there was no alternative treatment available. The nurses involved were consulted informally: 94% were questioned about the request for EAS and 93% about the physician's intention to comply. Seventy-five percent of the respondents said they had made some sort of written notes regarding the last time they had administered EAS. The number of certificates testifying to death by natural causes fell after 1988. In 41% of the cases all requirements were met.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that Dutch NHPs observe all the requirements for EAS in 41% of cases. In the remaining cases, shortcomings were found: NHPs allowed too little time between the first discussion and the actual administration; they did not always keep written records; or they signed a death certificate testifying that the patient had died a natural death.

摘要

目的

获取有关荷兰养老院医生实施自愿主动安乐死和/或医生协助自杀(EAS)的方式的数据,并了解他们如何应对审慎操作的要求。这些要求包括:患者必须感到其痛苦无法忍受且毫无希望;想死的愿望必须经过深思熟虑且持续存在;请求必须是自愿的;养老院医生必须咨询至少另一位医生;医生不得开具证明自然死亡的证书,并且有义务保存记录。

设计、背景、参与者、测量方法:见前文。

结果

69名养老院医生(12%)表示他们至少实施过一次EAS。在88%的案例中,养老院医生将患者的状况描述为完全绝望,在64%的案例中描述为完全无法忍受。从首次讨论该主题到实际实施的时间间隔从不到一天到一年多不等。请求的最常见原因是无法忍受的痛苦(53%)和绝望的痛苦(49%)。大多数养老院医生(85%)表示是患者首先提出EAS的主题。85%的养老院医生还请求与另一位医生进行会诊。在大多数情况下,第二种意见由另一位养老院医生给出(63%);其中超过50%的养老院医生在同一家养老院工作。咨询的医生中有91%确信该请求经过了深思熟虑,93%发现没有其他可用的治疗方法。涉及的护士被非正式咨询:94%被问及EAS请求,93%被问及医生同意的意图。75%的受访者表示他们就上次实施EAS做了某种书面记录。1988年后,证明自然死亡的证书数量下降。在41%的案例中,所有要求都得到了满足。

结论

本研究结果表明,荷兰养老院医生在41%的案例中遵守了EAS的所有要求。在其余案例中,发现了不足之处:养老院医生在首次讨论和实际实施之间留出的时间太少;他们并非总是保留书面记录;或者他们签署了死亡证明,证明患者死于自然原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验