Ishida E
Department of Business Administration, Bunkyo Women's College, Saitama.
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 1994 Feb;64(6):417-25. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.64.417.
Four-hundred and seventy-seven subjects evaluated a set of traits and behaviors in terms of how masculine and feminine they were and in terms of how well they represented their real and ideal self-images. Within-individual correlation coefficients between these evaluations were proposed as measures of psychological gender schemata, because they would represent the degree of matching between the subjects' gender-image and ideal/real self-images of gender-related attributes. The present study aims at examining the construct validity of these measures, by testing them to psychological variables that are known to reflect gender identity. The individual difference variables used as criteria were (a) satisfaction with one's own sex, (b) general happiness, (c) self-esteem (d) gender-conflict, and (e) school and occupational achievement need. Correlations between the gender-schema indices and the criteria variables supported the construct validity of those measures. Advantages of the present measurement over the conventional simple trait approach, such as BSRI, or PAQ are discussed.
477名受试者根据一系列特质和行为的阳刚与阴柔程度，以及它们在多大程度上代表了自己真实和理想的自我形象对其进行了评估。这些评估之间的个体内相关系数被提议作为心理性别图式的度量，因为它们将代表受试者的性别形象与性别相关属性的理想/真实自我形象之间的匹配程度。本研究旨在通过将这些度量应用于已知能反映性别认同的心理变量来检验其结构效度。用作标准的个体差异变量包括：（a）对自己性别的满意度，（b）总体幸福感，（c）自尊，（d）性别冲突，以及（e）学业和职业成就需求。性别图式指数与标准变量之间的相关性支持了这些度量的结构效度。文中还讨论了本测量方法相对于传统简单特质方法（如贝姆性别角色量表或个人属性问卷）的优势。
