Conzelmann-Auer C, Braun-Fahrländer C, Ackermann-Liebrich U, Wanner H U
Institut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin der Universität Basel.
Soz Praventivmed. 1993;38(4):231-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01624541.
The objective of this study was to assess to what extent the subjective annoyance is influenced by the actually measured or calculated street traffic noise and by sociodemographic factors. In the study on air pollution and health in Basle a representative sample of 1033 families with children up to five years were asked how they perceived street traffic noise. The extent of annoyance was assessed with a scale from 0 (no annoyance) to 10 (unbearably annoyed). The actual noise levels were taken from the official noise-register. Nearly 30% of the families were exposed to > 65 dB(A) in daytime. Immigrant families as well as participants with low education more frequently lived in streets with higher noise levels than Swiss families or participants with higher education. 16.4% considered themselves heavily annoyed by traffic noise (scale 8-10). The proportion of heavily annoyed participants was positively correlated with the actual noise levels, the slope was steepest at a noise level between 60-65 dB(A). By means of a multiple regression it could be shown that, adjusting for education level and city district, the actual noise level was the best predictor of subjective annoyance.
本研究的目的是评估主观烦恼在多大程度上受到实际测量或计算得出的街道交通噪声以及社会人口统计学因素的影响。在巴塞尔进行的一项关于空气污染与健康的研究中,对1033个有5岁以下儿童的家庭组成的代表性样本,询问了他们对街道交通噪声的感受。烦恼程度用从0(无烦恼)到10(烦扰不堪)的量表进行评估。实际噪声水平取自官方噪声登记册。近30%的家庭白天暴露于>65分贝(A)的噪声环境中。移民家庭以及受教育程度低的参与者比瑞士家庭或受教育程度高的参与者更频繁地居住在噪声水平较高的街道。16.4%的人认为自己深受交通噪声烦扰(量表评分为8 - 10)。深受烦扰的参与者比例与实际噪声水平呈正相关,在60 - 65分贝(A)的噪声水平下斜率最陡。通过多元回归分析表明,在调整教育水平和城区因素后,实际噪声水平是主观烦恼的最佳预测指标。