Wyman J B, Dent J, Holloway R H
Gastroenterology Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Australia.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1993 Sep;28(9):827-32. doi: 10.3109/00365529309104017.
Traditionally, gastro-oesophageal reflux is deemed to have occurred when oesophageal pH falls below 4. Other 'non-traditional' pH changes that do not fall below pH 4, that fall below 4 for only brief intervals, or that occur when basal pH is less than 4 are usually disregarded. The aim of this study was to determine whether these non-traditional pH changes represent gastro-oesophageal reflux or are artefactual. The 3-h postprandial combined oesophageal pH and manometric records of 22 patients referred for investigation of suspected gastro-oesophageal reflux were reviewed. All pH falls of > or = 0.5 pH units were analysed for manometric evidence of reflux that was classified as definite, probable, or possible. In total, 196 traditional and 223 non-traditional pH events were scored and analysed. The majority of traditional (80%) and non-traditional (60%) events were associated with definite manometric evidence of reflux, although a greater proportion of non-traditional events were associated with only probable evidence of reflux (33%) compared with traditional events (18%). The proportions of possible reflux were similar in the two groups. Limiting pH events to only those satisfying traditional criteria excluded an additional 32% with definite manometric evidence of reflux and 49% with definite or probable evidence of reflux. Most pH falls that remained above 4 or fell across 4 for < 15 sec occurred in the 1st h postprandially, compared with traditional pH events, which occurred equally throughout the 3-h period. We conclude that traditional criteria for scoring pH episodes substantially underestimate the number of reflux episodes.
传统上,当食管pH值降至4以下时,被认为发生了胃食管反流。其他“非传统”的pH值变化,即未降至4以下、仅在短时间内降至4以下或在基础pH值低于4时发生的变化,通常被忽略。本研究的目的是确定这些非传统的pH值变化是代表胃食管反流还是人为造成的。回顾了22例因疑似胃食管反流而转诊患者的餐后3小时食管pH值和测压联合记录。对所有pH值下降≥0.5个pH单位的情况进行分析,以寻找反流的测压证据,并将其分类为明确、可能或疑似反流。总共对196次传统pH值事件和223次非传统pH值事件进行了评分和分析。大多数传统(80%)和非传统(60%)事件都伴有明确的反流测压证据,尽管与传统事件(18%)相比,非传统事件中仅伴有可能反流证据的比例更高(33%)。两组中疑似反流的比例相似。仅将pH值事件限制在符合传统标准的事件范围内,会额外排除32%有明确反流测压证据的患者以及49%有明确或可能反流证据的患者。与传统pH值事件在整个3小时内均匀发生不同,大多数pH值仍高于4或在4以下持续<15秒的情况发生在餐后第1小时。我们得出结论,对pH值发作进行评分的传统标准大大低估了反流发作的数量。