Lindop E
North Staffordshire College of Nursing and Midwifery, City General Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, England.
J Adv Nurs. 1993 Oct;18(10):1578-85. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1993.18101578.x.
This paper examines the difference between qualitative and quantitative research approaches and applies the debate to assessing student nurses' stress coping styles. In particular, it looks at the value of the qualitative approach as a means of appreciating the individual nature of the stress experience. A pilot study was conducted among a small group of Project 2000 students. The results illustrate that a flexible model which appreciates the differences in individual perception is a successful way of enabling students to handle negative stress. The paper also reports on a new concept called Determination and the Hypnotic Interaction model which enables student nurses to utilize determined experiences from previous times and apply them to present and future negative stress. The model utilizes a wide range of complementary therapy approaches including relaxation, imagery and hypnosis, to enable students to appreciate positive stress and to discover and use their natural resources of determination to deal with negative stress.
本文探讨了定性研究方法与定量研究方法之间的差异，并将这一争论应用于评估实习护士的压力应对方式。具体而言，它着眼于定性方法作为一种理解压力体验个体本质的手段的价值。在一小群2000计划的学生中进行了一项试点研究。结果表明，一个能够认识到个体认知差异的灵活模型是使学生应对负面压力的成功方法。本文还报告了一个名为“决心与催眠互动模型”的新概念，该模型使实习护士能够利用以往的坚定经历，并将其应用于当前和未来的负面压力中。该模型运用了广泛的辅助治疗方法，包括放松、意象和催眠，以使学生认识到积极压力，并发现和利用自身的决心自然资源来应对负面压力。
