Suppr超能文献

毛细作用细针采样与细针穿刺抽吸的比较。

Comparison of fine needle sampling by capillary action and fine needle aspiration.

作者信息

Dey P, Ray R

机构信息

Department of Cytology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Cytopathology. 1993;4(5):299-303. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.1993.tb00105.x.

Abstract

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) and non-suction fine needle sampling (FNS) were performed consecutively in 107 lesions from 100 patients. The quality of diagnostic material was assessed using a scoring system based on the cellularity and amount of blood in the smear. The total score in the FNS group was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than that of FNA technique. The FNS procedure is less traumatic and equally cost effective and can be safely undertaken in liver, orbital and thyroid lesions. In lymph nodes, especially in children, FNS gives an excellent cellular yield. However, this procedure can not be advocated in cystic, bony and fibrous lesions.

摘要

对100例患者的107个病灶连续进行细针穿刺抽吸(FNA)和非抽吸细针采样(FNS)。使用基于涂片细胞密度和血量的评分系统评估诊断材料的质量。FNS组的总分显著高于FNA技术组(P < 0.05)。FNS操作创伤较小,成本效益相同,可安全用于肝脏、眼眶和甲状腺病变。在淋巴结中,尤其是儿童,FNS能获得良好的细胞产量。然而,该操作不适用于囊性、骨性和纤维性病变。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验