Kumarasinghe M P, Sheriffdeen A H
Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Pathology. 1995 Oct;27(4):330-2. doi: 10.1080/00313029500169243.
Four hundred and ten thyroid nodules, 127 breast lumps and 43 lymph nodes were sampled and analyzed to compare the classical aspiration (ASP) technique with the non aspiration needle jab (NASP) technique. The adequacy of cellularity, significant blood staining and the discomfort felt by the patient were assessed and statistically analyzed. The non aspiration technique was found to be superior to the classical aspiration technique for fine needle sampling of thyroid in all aspects. However, for breast lesions, while the discomfort felt and the staining with blood was less with the non aspiration technique, the overall cellular yield was unsatisfactory. The adequacy of cellular yield was, however, comparable for malignant breast lesions with either technique. For lymph node sampling, both techniques showed equivalent results with regard to the cellularity but, the NASP technique was superior in other aspects. Although the overall patient discomfort and blood staining was significantly less, the adequacy of the cellularity was influenced by the site and the nature of the lesion. Thus it can be concluded that the technique needs to be selected depending on the anatomic site, the clinical situation, the personal experience and the preference of the operator.
对410个甲状腺结节、127个乳腺肿块和43个淋巴结进行采样和分析,以比较传统抽吸(ASP)技术与非抽吸针穿刺(NASP)技术。评估细胞量的充足性、显著的血液染色情况以及患者的不适感,并进行统计学分析。结果发现,在甲状腺细针采样的各个方面,非抽吸技术均优于传统抽吸技术。然而,对于乳腺病变,虽然非抽吸技术引起的不适感和血液染色较少,但总体细胞产量并不理想。不过,对于恶性乳腺病变,两种技术的细胞产量充足性相当。对于淋巴结采样,两种技术在细胞量方面显示出等效结果,但NASP技术在其他方面更具优势。虽然总体患者不适感和血液染色明显较少,但细胞量的充足性受病变部位和性质的影响。因此,可以得出结论,需要根据解剖部位、临床情况、个人经验和操作者的偏好来选择技术。