• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮下注射促红细胞生成素溶液与冻干制剂对接受血液透析患者的不良反应对比

[Adverse effects of subcutaneous administration of erythropoietin solution versus lyophilisate in patients receiving hemodialysis].

作者信息

Jensen G V, Nielsen B

机构信息

Nefrologisk afdeling, Hvidovre Hospital, København.

出版信息

Ugeskr Laeger. 1994 Jan 10;156(2):183-4.

PMID:8296408
Abstract

Twenty-two patients in haemodialysis were treated with erythropoietin subcutaneously in a double-blinded cross-over study with erythropoietin prepared either as a lyophilisate or an albumin-solution. The aim was to compare local reactions and pain. Both preparations were tolerated well. No major adverse reactions were seen. Erythropoietin albumin-solution was associated with significantly more burning pain than erythropoietin lyophilisate. Allergy does not seem to be involved. Albumin could be the irritative agent.

摘要

在一项双盲交叉研究中,对22名血液透析患者皮下注射促红细胞生成素,该促红细胞生成素制备成冻干制剂或白蛋白溶液。目的是比较局部反应和疼痛情况。两种制剂耐受性均良好,未观察到重大不良反应。与促红细胞生成素冻干制剂相比,促红细胞生成素白蛋白溶液引发的灼痛明显更多。似乎与过敏无关。白蛋白可能是刺激物。

相似文献

1
[Adverse effects of subcutaneous administration of erythropoietin solution versus lyophilisate in patients receiving hemodialysis].皮下注射促红细胞生成素溶液与冻干制剂对接受血液透析患者的不良反应对比
Ugeskr Laeger. 1994 Jan 10;156(2):183-4.
2
Conversion from subcutaneous to intravenous erythropoietin in a hemodialysis population.血液透析人群中促红细胞生成素从皮下给药转换为静脉给药的情况。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Aug;45(8):895-900. doi: 10.1177/0091270005278808.
3
Pain at the injection site of subcutaneously administered erythropoietin: phosphate-buffered epoetin alpha compared to citrate-buffered epoetin alpha and epoetin beta.皮下注射促红细胞生成素的注射部位疼痛:磷酸缓冲型α-促红细胞生成素与柠檬酸盐缓冲型α-促红细胞生成素及β-促红细胞生成素的比较
Clin Nephrol. 1998 Jan;49(1):41-4.
4
Erythropoietin dose requirements when converting from subcutaneous to intravenous administration among patients on hemodialysis.血液透析患者从皮下给药转换为静脉给药时的促红细胞生成素剂量需求。
Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Feb;40(2):198-203. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G425. Epub 2006 Jan 31.
5
Analysis of the efficacy of measures to reduce pain after subcutaneous administration of epoetin alfa.皮下注射促红细胞生成素α后减轻疼痛措施的疗效分析
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1994;9(9):1295-8.
6
Iron-replete hemodialysis patients do not require higher EPO dosages when converting from subcutaneous to intravenous administration: results of the Italian Study on Erythropoietin Converting (ISEC).铁储备充足的血液透析患者从皮下给药转换为静脉给药时不需要更高剂量的促红细胞生成素:意大利促红细胞生成素转换研究(ISEC)的结果。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2006 Jun;47(6):1027-35. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.02.176.
7
The continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A.) corrects anemia at extended administration intervals in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis: results of a phase II study.持续促红细胞生成素受体激活剂(C.E.R.A.)在延长给药间隔时可纠正未接受透析的慢性肾病患者的贫血:一项II期研究结果
Clin Nephrol. 2007 May;67(5):306-17.
8
Biocompatibility and permeability of dialyzer membranes do not affect anemia, erythropoietin dosage or mortality in japanese patients on chronic non-reuse hemodialysis: a prospective cohort study from the J-DOPPS II study.透析器膜的生物相容性和通透性不影响日本慢性非复用血液透析患者的贫血、促红细胞生成素剂量或死亡率:来自J-DOPPS II研究的前瞻性队列研究
Nephron Clin Pract. 2008;109(2):c100-8. doi: 10.1159/000142528. Epub 2008 Jul 3.
9
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of epoetin delta in two studies in healthy volunteers and two studies in patients with chronic kidney disease.在两项针对健康志愿者的研究以及两项针对慢性肾病患者的研究中,δ-促红细胞生成素的药代动力学和药效学。
Clin Ther. 2007 Jul;29(7):1368-80. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.07.014.
10
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of once-weekly subcutaneous epoetin alfa in critically ill patients: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.危重症患者每周一次皮下注射促红细胞生成素α的药代动力学和药效学:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的结果
Crit Care Med. 2006 Jun;34(6):1661-7. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000217919.22155.85.