Black A E, Prentice A M, Goldberg G R, Jebb S A, Bingham S A, Livingstone M B, Coward W A
Dunn Clinical Nutrition Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
J Am Diet Assoc. 1993 May;93(5):572-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-8223(93)91820-g.
The quantification of errors inherent in methods of measuring dietary intake has been handicapped by the absence of independent markers for testing their validity. The doubly labeled water technique permits a precise measure of energy expenditure in free-living persons. Because energy expenditure must equal energy intake in populations in energy balance, this technique may be used to validate the assessment of energy intake. A series of studies demonstrated good agreement between mean energy intake and mean energy expenditure when food intake was recorded by observers or when it was self-reported by normal-weight, self-selected, highly motivated volunteer subjects using weighed records. However, in randomly recruited men and women, energy intake by weighed records was 82% and 81%, of energy expenditure, respectively, indicating underestimation of habitual intake. Men and women in the lowest third of reported intake recorded energy expenditure of only 69% and 61%, respectively. Reported intake of obese and previously obese women was only 73% and 64% of expenditure, whether measured by weighed record or by diet history, confirming suspicions that these subjects misrepresented their intake. Acceptable weighed records were obtained from 7- and 9-year-olds whereas 15- and 18-year-olds underestimated intake. Diet histories taken from the same children tended to overestimate intake. These studies suggest that, ideally, all dietary studies should include independent measures of validity.
测量饮食摄入量方法中固有的误差量化一直因缺乏用于检验其有效性的独立标志物而受到阻碍。双标水技术能够精确测量自由生活人群的能量消耗。由于在能量平衡的人群中能量消耗必须等于能量摄入,因此该技术可用于验证能量摄入的评估。一系列研究表明,当由观察者记录食物摄入量或由体重正常、自行选择、积极性高的志愿者受试者通过称重记录自行报告食物摄入量时,平均能量摄入与平均能量消耗之间具有良好的一致性。然而,在随机招募的男性和女性中,通过称重记录得出的能量摄入量分别仅为能量消耗的82%和81%,表明习惯性摄入量被低估。报告摄入量处于最低三分之一的男性和女性记录的能量消耗分别仅为69%和61%。无论通过称重记录还是饮食史测量,肥胖和曾肥胖女性报告的摄入量仅为消耗量的73%和64%,这证实了人们的怀疑,即这些受试者虚报了他们的摄入量。7岁和9岁儿童能够提供可接受的称重记录,而15岁和18岁的儿童则低估了摄入量。从这些相同儿童那里获取的饮食史往往高估了摄入量。这些研究表明,理想情况下,所有饮食研究都应包括有效性的独立测量。