• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

焦虑与自我表露:迈向一种动机模型。

Anxiety and self-disclosure: toward a motivational model.

作者信息

Meleshko K G, Alden L E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 Jun;64(6):1000-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.64.6.1000.

DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.64.6.1000
PMID:8326465
Abstract

The self-disclosures of socially anxious and nonanxious Ss were compared within the framework of R. M. Arkin's (1981) motivational theory of social anxiety. Ss (N = 84 women) were paired with a confederate who disclosed at either a high or a low level of intimacy (i.e., the classic reciprocity paradigm). Consistent with R. M. Arkin's theory, anxious Ss were concerned with self-protection during the task and disclosed at a moderate level of intimacy regardless of their partner's behavior. In addition, anxious Ss did not reciprocate their partners' disclosures as well as did nonanxious Ss. The self-protective behaviors of the anxious Ss were associated with less liking and more discomfort on the part of their partners. This suggests that the adoption of self-protective strategies may elicit negative interpersonal reactions that maintain self-defeating interpersonal patterns in socially anxious people.

摘要

在R.M.阿金(1981)的社交焦虑动机理论框架内,对社交焦虑和非焦虑被试的自我表露进行了比较。被试(84名女性)与一名同盟者配对,该同盟者进行高亲密度或低亲密度的自我表露(即经典的互惠范式)。与R.M.阿金的理论一致,焦虑的被试在任务过程中关注自我保护,无论其搭档的行为如何,都以适度的亲密度进行自我表露。此外,焦虑的被试不像非焦虑的被试那样对搭档的自我表露做出回应。焦虑被试的自我保护行为会让其搭档产生较少的喜爱和较多的不适。这表明,采取自我保护策略可能会引发负面的人际反应,从而维持社交焦虑者自我挫败的人际模式。

相似文献

1
Anxiety and self-disclosure: toward a motivational model.焦虑与自我表露:迈向一种动机模型。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 Jun;64(6):1000-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.64.6.1000.
2
Effects of simulated approval-seeking and avoiding on self-disclosure, self-presentation, and interpersonal attraction.模拟寻求认可和避免认可对自我表露、自我呈现及人际吸引力的影响。
J Psychol. 1978 Mar;98(2d Half):231-40. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1978.9915966.
3
Communication and social skills in socially anxious and nonanxious individuals in the context of romantic relationships.浪漫关系背景下社交焦虑和非焦虑个体的沟通与社交技能。
Behav Res Ther. 2005 Apr;43(4):505-19. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2004.03.010.
4
Private and public self-awareness in social anxiety.社交焦虑中的私我意识与公我意识
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2008 Mar;39(1):57-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.09.004. Epub 2007 Jan 9.
5
Attributional responses of anxious individuals to different patterns of social feedback: nothing succeeds like improvement.焦虑个体对不同社会反馈模式的归因反应:没有什么比进步更能带来成功。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Jan;52(1):100-6. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.52.1.100.
6
Behavior when socially anxious individuals expect to be (dis)liked: The role of self-disclosure and mimicry in actual likeability.社交焦虑个体预期被(不)喜欢时的行为:自我表露和模仿在实际喜欢度中的作用。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2020 Dec;69:101574. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2020.101574. Epub 2020 May 4.
7
Self-disclosure: an attributional perspective.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1976 Feb;33(2):184-91. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.33.2.184.
8
Interpersonal consequences of the pursuit of safety.追求安全的人际后果。
Behav Res Ther. 1998 Jan;36(1):53-64. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(97)00072-7.
9
On the relationship among social anxiety, intimacy, sexual communication, and sexual satisfaction in young couples.论年轻夫妇中社交焦虑、亲密关系、性沟通和性满意度之间的关系。
Arch Sex Behav. 2013 Jan;42(1):81-91. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-9929-3. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
10
Social anxiety, sexual behavior, and contraceptive use.社交焦虑、性行为与避孕措施的使用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983 Dec;45(6):1347-54. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.45.6.1347.

引用本文的文献

1
Social anxiety undermines prosocial behaviors when required effort.当需要付出努力时,社交焦虑会破坏亲社会行为。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2024 Oct-Dec;24(4):100533. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100533. Epub 2024 Dec 15.
2
Influence of physical activity on problematic smartphone use in medical students: mediating effects of social anxiety and the moderating role of gender.体育活动对医学生问题性智能手机使用的影响:社交焦虑的中介作用及性别的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 29;15:1445847. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1445847. eCollection 2024.
3
Disrupted joint action accounts for reduced likability of socially anxious individuals.
联合行动中断导致社交焦虑个体的受欢迎程度降低。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;68:101512. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.101512. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
4
Facial Affect and Interpersonal Affiliation: Displays of Emotion During Relationship Formation in Social Anxiety Disorder.面部表情与人际依恋:社交焦虑障碍患者在关系形成过程中的情绪表现
Clin Psychol Sci. 2019 Jul;7(4):826-839. doi: 10.1177/2167702619825857. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
5
Social context and the real-world consequences of social anxiety.社交情境与社交焦虑的现实后果。
Psychol Med. 2020 Sep;50(12):1989-2000. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719002022. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
6
Self-report of self-disclosure statements for stuttering.口吃自我表露陈述的自我报告。
J Fluency Disord. 2018 Dec;58:22-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
7
Awareness and Awakening: A Narrative-Oriented Inquiry of Undergraduate Students' Development of Mindful Agency in China.觉知与觉醒:一项关于中国本科生正念能动性发展的叙事导向性探究
Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 21;8:2036. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02036. eCollection 2017.
8
The behavioral economics of social anxiety disorder reveal a robust effect for interpersonal traits.社交焦虑障碍的行为经济学揭示了人际特质的强大影响。
Behav Res Ther. 2017 Aug;95:139-147. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
9
The affective tie that binds: Examining the contribution of positive emotions and anxiety to relationship formation in social anxiety disorder.维系情感的纽带:探究积极情绪和焦虑对社交焦虑障碍中人际关系形成的影响。
J Anxiety Disord. 2017 Jun;49:21-30. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
10
Clarifying the Behavioral Economics of Social Anxiety Disorder: Effects of Interpersonal Problems and Symptom Severity on Generosity.阐明社交焦虑障碍的行为经济学:人际问题和症状严重程度对慷慨程度的影响。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2016 Jan;4(1):107-121. doi: 10.1177/2167702615578128. Epub 2015 Jun 2.