Szarewski A, Curran G, Edwards R, Cuzick J, Kocjan G, Bounds W, Guillebaud J
Margaret Pyke Centre, London, England.
Acta Cytol. 1993 Jul-Aug;37(4):457-60.
In recent years, several new cervical sampling techniques have been introduced to try to improve the accuracy of the cervical smear. In the present study four such techniques were compared: the Aylesbury spatula, Rolon spatula, Cervex device and Aylesbury spatula used in conjunction with a Cytobrush. The total number of smears collected was 14,172, 80% of which were from women under age 35. Despite large differences between the techniques with regard to the presence of endocervical cells in smears, no differences were found in the detection of dysplasia. Endocervical cells were seen significantly more often in dysplastic smears than in negative smears. There was little difference in the rate of unsatisfactory samples. It appears that in a young population, the instruments used for cervical sampling are not likely to significantly influence the detection of dysplasia if skilled personnel take the smears.
近年来,已引入了几种新的宫颈取样技术,试图提高宫颈涂片检查的准确性。在本研究中,对四种此类技术进行了比较:艾尔斯伯里刮板、罗隆刮板、塞尔韦克斯装置以及与细胞刷联合使用的艾尔斯伯里刮板。收集的涂片总数为1,4172张,其中80%来自35岁以下的女性。尽管这些技术在涂片内宫颈管细胞的存在方面存在很大差异,但在发育异常的检测方面未发现差异。在发育异常的涂片中,宫颈管细胞的出现频率明显高于阴性涂片。不满意样本的比例几乎没有差异。看来,在年轻人群中,如果由技术熟练的人员进行涂片采集,用于宫颈取样的器械不太可能对发育异常的检测产生显著影响。