Suppr超能文献

一家大型计划生育中心四种细胞学采样技术的比较。

Comparison of four cytologic sampling techniques in a large family planning center.

作者信息

Szarewski A, Curran G, Edwards R, Cuzick J, Kocjan G, Bounds W, Guillebaud J

机构信息

Margaret Pyke Centre, London, England.

出版信息

Acta Cytol. 1993 Jul-Aug;37(4):457-60.

PMID:8328239
Abstract

In recent years, several new cervical sampling techniques have been introduced to try to improve the accuracy of the cervical smear. In the present study four such techniques were compared: the Aylesbury spatula, Rolon spatula, Cervex device and Aylesbury spatula used in conjunction with a Cytobrush. The total number of smears collected was 14,172, 80% of which were from women under age 35. Despite large differences between the techniques with regard to the presence of endocervical cells in smears, no differences were found in the detection of dysplasia. Endocervical cells were seen significantly more often in dysplastic smears than in negative smears. There was little difference in the rate of unsatisfactory samples. It appears that in a young population, the instruments used for cervical sampling are not likely to significantly influence the detection of dysplasia if skilled personnel take the smears.

摘要

近年来,已引入了几种新的宫颈取样技术,试图提高宫颈涂片检查的准确性。在本研究中,对四种此类技术进行了比较:艾尔斯伯里刮板、罗隆刮板、塞尔韦克斯装置以及与细胞刷联合使用的艾尔斯伯里刮板。收集的涂片总数为1,4172张,其中80%来自35岁以下的女性。尽管这些技术在涂片内宫颈管细胞的存在方面存在很大差异,但在发育异常的检测方面未发现差异。在发育异常的涂片中,宫颈管细胞的出现频率明显高于阴性涂片。不满意样本的比例几乎没有差异。看来,在年轻人群中,如果由技术熟练的人员进行涂片采集,用于宫颈取样的器械不太可能对发育异常的检测产生显著影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验