Whincup P H, Cook D G, Strachan D P, Papacosta O
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Royal Free Hospital and School of Medicine, London.
Arch Dis Child. 1993 Jun;68(6):729-34. doi: 10.1136/adc.68.6.729.
Two cross sectional surveys, 24 years apart, using the same respiratory questionnaire, were carried out to examine changes in prevalence rates of cough, phlegm, and wheeze and to relate changes in wheeze to objective peak expiratory flow rates (PEFRs). The surveys were done in towns in southern and northern England and South Wales in schoolchildren aged 6.0-7.5 years; n = 1655 in 1966 and n = 2323 in 1990. Parents reported on winter cough and winter phlegm (early morning or day/night) and wheeze; PEFRs were also measured. The proportion of children reported as wheezing on most days or nights increased from 3.9% to 6.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) for increase -0.2 to 4.6), with a smaller increase in the prevalence of those who had ever wheezed. The proportion of children with day or night time cough increased from 21.1% to 33.3% (95% CI for increase 3.8 to 20.6) and the proportion with day or night time phlegm increased from 5.8% to 10.0% (95% CI for increase 0.4 to 8.0). Smaller increases in the prevalence of persistent cough (from 9.0% to 12.4%) and persistent phlegm (from 2.4% to 3.5%) were also observed, while morning cough and morning phlegm showed little change. The increases in cough and phlegm were apparent in subjects with and without a history of wheeze. Both absolute and proportional changes in symptom prevalence were generally greater in the north than in the south. Similar social class trends were seen in each survey. The mean difference in PEFR between subjects with and without wheeze was smaller in 1990 than in 1966, but this result could be influenced by a greater proportion of subjects receiving antiasthmatic treatment in the 1990 survey. These apparent increases in the prevalence of persistent wheeze, day and night time cough and phlegm, occurring over a period during which outdoor air pollution levels have decreased substantially, deserve further investigation.
相隔24年进行了两项横断面调查,使用相同的呼吸问卷,以检查咳嗽、咳痰和喘息患病率的变化,并将喘息的变化与客观呼气峰值流速(PEFR)相关联。调查在英格兰南部和北部以及南威尔士的城镇中6.0 - 7.5岁的学童中进行;1966年有1655名儿童参与,1990年有2323名儿童参与。家长报告了冬季咳嗽、冬季咳痰(清晨或白天/夜间)和喘息情况;同时也测量了PEFR。报告称大多数日子或夜晚喘息的儿童比例从3.9%增至6.1%(增加的95%置信区间(CI)为 -0.2至4.6),曾经喘息过的儿童患病率增加幅度较小。白天或夜间咳嗽的儿童比例从21.1%增至33.3%(增加的95%CI为3.8至20.6),白天或夜间咳痰的儿童比例从5.8%增至10.0%(增加的95%CI为0.4至8.0)。还观察到持续性咳嗽(从9.0%增至12.4%)和持续性咳痰(从2.4%增至3.5%)的患病率增加幅度较小,而清晨咳嗽和清晨咳痰变化不大。有喘息病史和无喘息病史的受试者中咳嗽和咳痰均有增加。症状患病率的绝对变化和比例变化在北部总体上比南部更大。每次调查中都观察到类似的社会阶层趋势。1990年有喘息和无喘息受试者的PEFR平均差异比1966年小,但这一结果可能受到1990年调查中接受抗哮喘治疗的受试者比例更高的影响。在室外空气污染水平大幅下降的时期内,持续性喘息、白天和夜间咳嗽及咳痰的患病率出现这些明显增加,值得进一步研究。