Claas E C, van Milaan A J, Sprenger M J, Ruiten-Stuiver M, Arron G I, Rothbarth P H, Masurel N
Department of Virology, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Aug;31(8):2218-21. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.8.2218-2221.1993.
A prospective clinical evaluation of the reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RNA PCR) for detection of influenza viruses was carried out with specimens from 342 patients of a children's hospital in The Netherlands. The RNA PCR, carried out directly on the specimens without an organic extraction, showed a sensitivity and specificity which are superior to those of direct immunofluorescence and comparable to those of cell culture combined with immunofluorescence (culture/IF). Negative results can be obtained within 2 days by the RNA PCR but may take up to 14 days by culture/IF. Because culturing is the standard technique for the detection of respiratory viruses, at this moment there are no strong arguments to replace culture/IF with RNA PCR for the detection of influenza A virus.
我们对荷兰一家儿童医院342例患者的样本进行了逆转录聚合酶链反应(RNA PCR)检测流感病毒的前瞻性临床评估。RNA PCR直接在未经有机提取的样本上进行,其灵敏度和特异性优于直接免疫荧光法,与细胞培养结合免疫荧光法(培养/IF)相当。RNA PCR可在2天内获得阴性结果,而培养/IF可能需要长达14天。由于培养是检测呼吸道病毒的标准技术,目前尚无充分理由用RNA PCR取代培养/IF来检测甲型流感病毒。