Bork P, Sander C, Valencia A
European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Protein Sci. 1993 Jan;2(1):31-40. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560020104.
Kinases that catalyze phosphorylation of sugars, called here sugar kinases, can be divided into at least three distinct nonhomologous families. The first is the hexokinase family, which contains many prokaryotic and eukaryotic sugar kinases with diverse specificities, including a new member, rhamnokinase from Salmonella typhimurium. The three-dimensional structure of hexokinase is known and can be used to build models of functionally important regions of other kinases in this family. The second is the ribokinase family, of unknown three-dimensional structure, and comprises pro- and eukaryotic ribokinases, bacterial fructokinases, the minor 6-phosphofructokinase 2 from Escherichia coli, 6-phosphotagatokinase, 1-phosphofructokinase, and, possibly, inosine-guanosine kinase. The third family, also of unknown three-dimensional structure, contains several bacterial and yeast galactokinases and eukaryotic mevalonate and phosphomevalonate kinases and may have a substrate binding region in common with homoserine kinases. Each of the three families of sugar kinases appears to have a distinct three-dimensional fold, since conserved sequence patterns are strikingly different for the three families. Yet each catalyzes chemically equivalent reactions on similar or identical substrates. The enzymatic function of sugar phosphorylation appears to have evolved independently on the three distinct structural frameworks, by convergent evolution. In addition, evolutionary trees reveal that (1) fructokinase specificity has evolved independently in both the hexokinase and ribokinase families and (2) glucose specificity has evolved independently in different branches of the hexokinase family. These are examples of independent Darwinian adaptation of a structure to the same substrate at different evolutionary times. The flexible combination of active sites and three-dimensional folds observed in nature can be exploited by protein engineers in designing and optimizing enzymatic function.
催化糖类磷酸化的激酶,在此称为糖激酶,可分为至少三个不同的非同源家族。第一个是己糖激酶家族,它包含许多具有不同特异性的原核和真核糖激酶,包括一个新成员,即鼠伤寒沙门氏菌的鼠李糖激酶。己糖激酶的三维结构已知,可用于构建该家族中其他激酶功能重要区域的模型。第二个是核糖激酶家族,其三维结构未知,包括原核和真核核糖激酶、细菌果糖激酶、大肠杆菌中的次要6-磷酸果糖激酶2、6-磷酸塔罗糖激酶、1-磷酸果糖激酶,以及可能的肌苷-鸟苷激酶。第三个家族,其三维结构也未知,包含几种细菌和酵母半乳糖激酶以及真核甲羟戊酸激酶和磷酸甲羟戊酸激酶,并且可能与高丝氨酸激酶有共同的底物结合区域。糖激酶的这三个家族中的每一个似乎都有独特的三维折叠,因为这三个家族的保守序列模式明显不同。然而,每个家族都催化相似或相同底物上化学等价的反应。糖磷酸化的酶促功能似乎是通过趋同进化在三个不同的结构框架上独立进化的。此外,进化树显示:(1)果糖激酶特异性在己糖激酶和核糖激酶家族中均独立进化;(2)葡萄糖特异性在己糖激酶家族的不同分支中独立进化。这些是在不同进化时期结构对同一底物进行独立达尔文适应的例子。蛋白质工程师可以利用自然界中观察到的活性位点和三维折叠的灵活组合来设计和优化酶的功能。