Cowman R A, Baron S S
Dental Research Unit, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Miami, Florida 33125.
Infect Immun. 1993 Jan;61(1):182-6. doi: 10.1128/iai.61.1.182-186.1993.
In this study, native cells of Streptococcus mutans VA-29R and Streptococcus rattus FA-1 displayed significantly higher aminopeptidase activity than did cells of Streptococcus cricetus AHT or Streptococcus sobrinus 6715 toward the nitroanilide derivatives of leucine, alanine, methionine, arginine, and lysine. These differences in cellular aminopeptidase activity led us to investigate the subcellular localization of the aminopeptidase in these mutans group streptococci. Following conversion of native cells to protoplasts by treatment with lysozyme, most of the aminopeptidase activity detected in the native-cell preparations remained associated with the intact protoplasts. After lysis of protoplasts and differential centrifugation, most of the total cellular aminopeptidase activity was recovered with the cytoplasmic fraction. Membrane-associated aminopeptidases represented only minor activities in these mutans group streptococci. Although the four strains showed no differences with respect to a predominant cytoplasmic localization for the aminopeptidase activities, the levels of activity in the cytoplasmic fractions from S. cricetus AHT and S. sobrinus 6715 were significantly lower than those measurable in the corresponding fractions from S. mutans VA-29R and S. rattus FA-1. These results support the conclusion that the differences in aminopeptidase activity expressed by these streptococci reflect quantitative differences rather than differences in enzyme subcellular localization.
在本研究中,变形链球菌VA - 29R和鼠链球菌FA - 1的天然细胞对亮氨酸、丙氨酸、蛋氨酸、精氨酸和赖氨酸的硝基苯胺衍生物所表现出的氨肽酶活性,显著高于仓鼠链球菌AHT或远缘链球菌6715的细胞。细胞氨肽酶活性的这些差异促使我们研究这些变形链球菌属链球菌中氨肽酶的亚细胞定位。在用溶菌酶处理将天然细胞转化为原生质体后,在天然细胞制剂中检测到的大部分氨肽酶活性仍与完整的原生质体相关。原生质体裂解并进行差速离心后,大部分细胞总氨肽酶活性在细胞质组分中回收。膜相关氨肽酶在这些变形链球菌属链球菌中仅表现出少量活性。尽管这四株菌在氨肽酶活性的主要细胞质定位方面没有差异,但仓鼠链球菌AHT和远缘链球菌6715细胞质组分中的活性水平显著低于变形链球菌VA - 29R和鼠链球菌FA - 1相应组分中可测量的活性水平。这些结果支持这样的结论,即这些链球菌所表达的氨肽酶活性差异反映的是数量差异,而非酶亚细胞定位的差异。